Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761288›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dermatology2017

Influence of Repeated Senna Laxative Use on Skin Barrier Function in Mice.

Satoshi Yokoyama, Keiichi Hiramoto, Yurika Yamate, Kazuya Ooi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dermatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satoshi YokoyamaLaboratory of Community Pharmacy, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, Japan.
Keiichi HiramotoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Mie, Japan.
Yurika YamateDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Mie, Japan.
Kazuya OoiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Suzuka University of Medical Science, Mie, Japan.
Gifu Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSenna, one of the major stimulant laxatives, is widely used for treating constipation. Chronic senna use has been reported to be associated with colonic disorders such as melanosis coli and/or epithelial hyperplasia. However, there is no obvious information on the influence of chronic senna use on organs except for the intestine.

objectiveTo clarify the influence of senna laxative use on skin barrier function by repeated senna administration.

methodsEight-week-old male hairless mice received senna (10 mg/kg/day) for 21 days. After administration, we evaluated transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and investigated the biomarkers in plasma and skin using protein analysis methods.

resultsFecal water content on day seven was significantly increased; however, on day 21, it was significantly decreased after repeated senna administration. In the senna-administered group, TEWL was significantly higher compared to the control on days seven and 21. Plasma acetylcholine concentration and NO

conclusionIt was suggested that diarrhea or constipation induced by repeated senna administration caused the impairment of skin barrier function. There is a possibility that this impaired skin barrier function occurred due to degranulation of mast cells via cholinergic signals or oxidative stress derived from iNOS.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineNitric oxide synthase type IISenna extractSkin hydrationTransepidermal water loss

Identifiers

PMID28761288
PMCPMC5500705
OpenAlexW2728573633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.