Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761144›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Plant survival and keystone pollinator species in stochastic coextinction models: role of intrinsic dependence on animal-pollination.

Anna Traveset, Cristina Tur, Víctor M Eguíluz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The role ofEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  5. Modeling scale up of anthropogenic impacts from individual pollinator behavior to pollination systems.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Co-adaptation enhances the resilience of mutualistic networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna TravesetInstitut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Global Change Research Group, C/Miquel Marqués 21, E07190-Esporles, Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Cristina TurInstitut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Global Change Research Group, C/Miquel Marqués 21, E07190-Esporles, Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Víctor M EguíluzInstituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC-UIB), E07122, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. victor@ifisc.uib-csic.es.ORCID 0000-0003-1133-1289
Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies · ESInstitute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coextinction models are useful to understand community robustness to species loss and resilience to disturbances. We simulated pollinator extinctions in pollination networks by using a hybrid model that combined a recently developed stochastic coextinction model (SCM) for plant extinctions and a topological model (TCM) for animal extinctions. Our model accounted for variation in interaction strengths and included empirical estimates of plant dependence on pollinators to set seeds. The stochastic nature of such model allowed us determining plant survival to single (and multiple) extinction events, and identifying which pollinators (keystone species) were more likely to trigger secondary extinctions. Consistently across three different pollinator removal sequences, plant robustness was lower than in a pure TCM, and plant survival was more determined by dependence on the mutualism than by interaction strength. As expected, highly connected and dependent plants were the most sensitive to pollinator loss and collapsed faster in extinction cascades. We predict that the relationship between dependence and plant connectivity is crucial to determine network robustness to interaction loss. Finally, we showed that honeybees and several beetles were keystone species in our communities. This information is of great value to foresee consequences of pollinator losses facing current global change and to identify target species for effective conservation.

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalPlant DevelopmentPollinationAnimalsBeesColeopteraConservation of Natural ResourcesSpecies SpecificityStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID28761144
PMCPMC5537349
OpenAlexW2737410539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.