Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Modeling Dominant and Recessive Forms of Retinitis Pigmentosa by Editing Three Rhodopsin-Encoding Genes in Xenopus Laevis Using Crispr/Cas9.

Joanna M Feehan, Colette N Chiu, Paloma Stanar, Beatrice M Tam, Sheikh N Ahmed, Orson L Moritz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Manipulating the microbiome alters regenerative outcomes in Xenopus laevis tadpoles via lipopolysaccharide signalling.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Retina regeneration: lessons from vertebrates.Oxford open neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Autophagy inAutophagy · 2019
    Article
  12. Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  13. The Many Faces ofFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Xenbase: Facilitating the Use ofFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna M FeehanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9.
Colette N ChiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9.
Paloma StanarDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9.
Beatrice M TamDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9.
Sheikh N AhmedDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9.
Orson L MoritzDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9. olmoritz@mail.ubc.ca.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of Xenopus laevis, a common research subject for developmental biology, retinal physiology, cell biology, and other investigations, has been limited by lack of a robust gene knockout or knock-down technology. Here we describe manipulation of the X. laevis genome using CRISPR/Cas9 to model the human disorder retinitis pigmentosa, and to introduce point mutations or exogenous DNA sequences. We introduced and characterized in-frame and out-of-frame insertions and deletions in three genes encoding rhodopsin by co-injection of Cas9 mRNA, eGFP mRNA, and single guide RNAs into fertilized eggs. Deletions were characterized by direct sequencing and cloning; phenotypes were assessed by assays of rod opsin in retinal extracts, and confocal microscopy of cryosectioned and immunolabeled contralateral eyes. We obtained germline transmission of editing to F1 offspring. In-frame deletions frequently caused dominant retinal degeneration associated with rhodopsin biosynthesis defects, while frameshift phenotypes were consistent with knockout. We inserted eGFP or point mutations into rhodopsin genes by co-injection of repair fragments with homology to the Cas9 target sites. Our techniques can produce high frequency gene editing in X. laevis, permitting analysis in the F0 generation, and advancing the utility of X. laevis as a subject for biological research and disease modeling.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsFemaleGene EditingGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansMalePhenotypePoint MutationRetinitis PigmentosaRhodopsinRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9enhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRhodopsinRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28761125
PMCPMC5537283
OpenAlexW2737167849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.