Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28761027›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine

Five-year epidemiological trends for chemical poisoning in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Sami Hamdan Alzahrani, Nahla Khamis Ibrahim, Mohammed Abdel Elnour, Ali Hassan Alqahtani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Minimum Data Set for a Poisoning Registry: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sami Hamdan AlzahraniDr. Sami H. Alzahrani, Department of Family and Community Medicine,, King Abdulaziz University,, Abdullah Sulayman, 22254,, Jeddah 21441,, Saudi Arabia, T: +966126408403, drsamihz@gmail.com, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6786-7184.
Nahla Khamis Ibrahim
Mohammed Abdel Elnour
Ali Hassan Alqahtani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoisoning is a significant global public health challenge in terms of morbidity and mortality. We conducted this study because of the lack of large population-based studies on chemical poisoning in Saudi Arabia.

objectiveDescribe epidemiological trends, associated factors, and outcomes of chemical poisoning cases reported to the Jeddah Health Affairs Directorate, Saudi Arabia.

designDescriptive, retrospective medical record review.

settingPopulation database for the Jeddah Governorate.

methodsFor chemical poisoning cases reported from January 2011 to December 2015, data was collection using a standardized, validated data collection sheet. Data was collected on personal characteristics, type of chemical poisoning and outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Descriptive epidemiological data and statistical comparisons.

resultsFor 994 chemical poisoning cases, an increasing trend was observed from 2011 to 2013 followed by some reduction during 2014 and 2015. The highest percentage of cases occurred during July followed by March for the cumulative total cases by month for all years. More than half of the cases involved males (55%), and children aged less than 5 years (56.6%). About three-fourths of the cases occurred accidentally and through ingestion. The most common poisonous agents were detergents (36.0%). Poisoning with addictive drugs occurred in 13 cases (1.3%). Only 1.1% of cases received a poisoning specific antidote, and the same percentage died because of poisoning. Gender, age, nationality, the route and the circumstances of the exposure were significantly associated with the type of poisoning (P < .001).

conclusionMost of chemical poisoning cases were accidental, occurred during summer, were caused by detergents, affected children < 5 years of age, and occurred via ingestion. Educational programs are needed to raise public awareness about poisoning, and to minimize the access of children to poisonous agents, especially detergents. Such measures could contribute toward a further reduction of the chemical poisoning burden. LIMITATIONS: Some key statistics not reported. Information bias may have affected results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolDetergentsFemaleHumansMalePoisoningRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaSeasonsSex DistributionYoung AdultDetergents

Identifiers

PMID28761027
PMCPMC6150588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.