Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760990›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Engineering the lutein epoxide cycle into

Lauriebeth Leonelli, Matthew D Brooks, Krishna K Niyogi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research Progress in Improving Photosynthetic Efficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cia Zeaxanthin Biosynthesis,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dissecting and modeling zeaxanthin- and lutein-dependent nonphotochemical quenching inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauriebeth LeonelliHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Matthew D BrooksHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Krishna K NiyogiHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; niyogi@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7229-2071

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although sunlight provides the energy necessary for plants to survive and grow, light can also damage reaction centers of photosystem II (PSII) and reduce photochemical efficiency. To prevent damage, plants possess photoprotective mechanisms that dissipate excess excitation. A subset of these mechanisms is collectively referred to as NPQ, or nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsEpoxy CompoundsLuteinOxidoreductasesPlants, Genetically ModifiedXanthophyllsArabidopsis ProteinsEpoxy CompoundsLuteinOxidoreductasesviolaxanthin de-epoxidaseXanthophyllsluteinlutein epoxidenonphotochemical quenchingphotoprotectionxanthophyll cycle

Identifiers

PMID28760990
PMCPMC5565435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.