ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017
On the Structure of Cortical Microcircuits Inferred from Small Sample Sizes.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- How plasticity shapes the formation of neuronal assemblies driven by oscillatory and stochastic inputs.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Maximum likelihood estimation of spatially dependent interactions in large populations of cortical neurons.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Relating local connectivity and global dynamics in recurrent excitatory-inhibitory networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Dynamics of Structured Networks of Winfree Oscillators.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Regional NeurodegenerationFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021Article
- Cyclic transitions between higher order motifs underlie sustained asynchronous spiking in sparse recurrent networks.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Firing rate homeostasis counteracts changes in stability of recurrent neural networks caused by synapse loss in Alzheimer's disease.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Robust Associative Learning Is Sufficient to Explain the Structural and Dynamical Properties of Local Cortical Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Rich-club connectivity, diverse population coupling, and dynamical activity patterns emerging from local cortical circuits.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Article
- Ensemble stacking mitigates biases in inference of synaptic connectivity.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The structure in cortical microcircuits deviates from what would be expected in a purely random network, which has been seen as evidence of clustering. To address this issue, we sought to reproduce the nonrandom features of cortical circuits by considering several distinct classes of network topology, including clustered networks, networks with distance-dependent connectivity, and those with broad degree distributions. To our surprise, we found that all of these qualitatively distinct topologies could account equally well for all reported nonrandom features despite being easily distinguishable from one another at the network level. This apparent paradox was a consequence of estimating network properties given only small sample sizes. In other words, networks that differ markedly in their global structure can look quite similar locally. This makes inferring network structure from small sample sizes, a necessity given the technical difficulty inherent in simultaneous intracellular recordings, problematic. We found that a network statistic called the sample degree correlation (SDC) overcomes this difficulty. The SDC depends only on parameters that can be estimated reliably given small sample sizes and is an accurate fingerprint of every topological family. We applied the SDC criterion to data from rat visual and somatosensory cortex and discovered that the connectivity was not consistent with any of these main topological classes. However, we were able to fit the experimental data with a more general network class, of which all previous topologies were special cases. The resulting network topology could be interpreted as a combination of physical spatial dependence and nonspatial, hierarchical clustering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.