Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760860›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

On the Structure of Cortical Microcircuits Inferred from Small Sample Sizes.

Marina Vegué, Rodrigo Perin, Alex Roxin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dynamics of Structured Networks of Winfree Oscillators.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Regional NeurodegenerationFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Robust Associative Learning Is Sufficient to Explain the Structural and Dynamical Properties of Local Cortical Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marina VeguéCentre de Recerca Matemàtica, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-8623
Rodrigo PerinLaboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-3769
Alex RoxinDepartament de Matemàtiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, and aroxin@crm.cat.ORCID 000-0003-1015-8138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure in cortical microcircuits deviates from what would be expected in a purely random network, which has been seen as evidence of clustering. To address this issue, we sought to reproduce the nonrandom features of cortical circuits by considering several distinct classes of network topology, including clustered networks, networks with distance-dependent connectivity, and those with broad degree distributions. To our surprise, we found that all of these qualitatively distinct topologies could account equally well for all reported nonrandom features despite being easily distinguishable from one another at the network level. This apparent paradox was a consequence of estimating network properties given only small sample sizes. In other words, networks that differ markedly in their global structure can look quite similar locally. This makes inferring network structure from small sample sizes, a necessity given the technical difficulty inherent in simultaneous intracellular recordings, problematic. We found that a network statistic called the sample degree correlation (SDC) overcomes this difficulty. The SDC depends only on parameters that can be estimated reliably given small sample sizes and is an accurate fingerprint of every topological family. We applied the SDC criterion to data from rat visual and somatosensory cortex and discovered that the connectivity was not consistent with any of these main topological classes. However, we were able to fit the experimental data with a more general network class, of which all previous topologies were special cases. The resulting network topology could be interpreted as a combination of physical spatial dependence and nonspatial, hierarchical clustering.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalModels, StatisticalSample SizeAnimalsBrain MappingCerebral CortexData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansNerve NetReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityclusteringcortical connectivitymicrocircuitsmultiple patch-clampnetworksstatistics

Identifiers

PMID28760860
PMCPMC6596870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.