Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760798›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Protocol for a randomised crossover trial to evaluate patient and nurse satisfaction with electronic and elastomeric portable infusion pumps for the continuous administration of antibiotic therapy in the home: the Comparing Home Infusion Devices (CHID) study.

Jodie G Hobbs, Melissa K Ryan, Brett Ritchie, Janet K Sluggett, Andrew J Sluggett, Lucy Ralton, Karen J Reynolds

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The MOBILISE study: utilisation of ambulatory pumps in the inpatient setting to administer continuous antibiotic infusions-a randomised controlled trial.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Continuous infusion of antibiotics using elastomeric pumps in the hospital at home setting.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jodie G HobbsMedical Device Research Institute, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7589-9047
Melissa K RyanMedical Device Research Institute, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Brett RitchieInfectious Diseases Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Janet K SluggettCPIE Pharmacy Services, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrew J SluggettCPIE Pharmacy Services, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lucy RaltonInfectious Diseases Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Karen J ReynoldsMedical Device Research Institute, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders University · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious studies comparing satisfaction with electronic and elastomeric infusion pumps are limited, and improvements in size and usability of electronic pumps have since occurred. The Comparing Home Infusion Devices (CHID) study plans to assess patient and nurse satisfaction with an elastomeric and electronic pump for delivering intravenous antibiotic treatment in the home. Secondary objectives are to determine pump-related complications and actual antibiotic dose administered, evaluate temperature variation and compare pump operating costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CHID study will be a randomised, crossover trial. A trained research nurse will recruit patients with infectious disease aged ≥18 years and prescribed ≥8 days of continuous intravenous antibiotic therapy from the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) (Adelaide, Australia). Patients will be randomised to receive treatment at home via an elastomeric (Baxter Infusor) or an electronic (ambIT Continuous) infusion pump for 4-7 days, followed by the other for a further 4-7 days. Patient satisfaction will be assessed by a 10-item survey to be completed at the end of each arm. Nurse satisfaction will be assessed by a single 24-item survey. Patient logbooks and case notes from clinic visits will be screened to identify complications. Pumps/infusion bags will be weighed to estimate the volume of solution delivered. Temperature sensors will record skin and ambient temperatures during storage and use of the pumps throughout the infusion period. Costs relating to pumps, consumables, antibiotics and servicing will be determined. Descriptive statistics will summarise study data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the RAH Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/16/RAH/133 R20160420, version 6.0, 5 September 2016). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The CHID study will provide key insights into patient and provider satisfaction with elastomeric and electronic infusion pumps and inform future device selection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000251325; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient SatisfactionAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Over StudiesElastomersFemaleHumansInfusion PumpsInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPolymersPostoperative PainProspective StudiesSelf AdministrationAnti-Bacterial Agentselastomeric polymerElastomersPolymerselastomericHITHHospital at HomeInfusionpump

Identifiers

PMID28760798
PMCPMC5642663
OpenAlexW2741576097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.