Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760791›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Prevalence and prescription patterns of oral glucocorticoids in adults: a retrospective cross-sectional and cohort analysis in France.

Anne Bénard-Laribière, Antoine Pariente, Elodie Pambrun, Bernard Bégaud, Laurence Fardet, Pernelle Noize

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic Literature Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Use for Asthma Management.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Bénard-LaribièreUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Pharmacoepidemiology Team, Bordeaux, France.
Antoine ParienteUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Pharmacoepidemiology Team, Bordeaux, France.
Elodie PambrunUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Pharmacoepidemiology Team, Bordeaux, France.
Bernard BégaudUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Pharmacoepidemiology Team, Bordeaux, France.
Laurence FardetUniversité Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Pernelle NoizeUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Pharmacoepidemiology Team, Bordeaux, France.
Bordeaux Population Health · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study trends in use of oral glucocorticoids (GCs) among adults, characteristics of oral GC initiators and prescriptions for the prevention of potential adverse effects associated with GC therapy.

designFirst, a cross-sectional study repeated yearly was performed from 2007 to 2014 in a nationwide representative sample. Second, characteristics of initiators and patterns of GC therapy during the year following treatment initiation were described in a cohort of patients who began GC between 2007 and 2013.

settingPopulation-based study using data from the French reimbursement healthcare system (covering approximately 90% of the population) in patients aged ≥18 years.

resultsOver the study period, the prevalence of oral GC use ranged from 14.7% to 17.1% (95% CI 17.0%-17.2%) with a significant increase of 14.1% (95% CI +13.5% to +14.8%). The 2007-2013 cohort of oral GC initiators comprised 206 759 individuals. Oral GC use was mostly short-term (68% of unique reimbursement) and more than half of short-term users took concurrent antibiotics or respiratory/otological drugs. Chronic users (≥6 reimbursements/year) represented 1.8% (n=3789) of the cohort. The proportion of chronic users with comorbidities likely to be worsened by GC use (diabetes, psychotic disorders, osteoporosis) was 25%. Among patients at increased risk of osteoporosis, 62% received specific prevention/monitoring measures and only 27% had a bisphosphonate. Half of chronic oral GC users had a concurrent reimbursement of a proton pump inhibitor in the absence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.

conclusionsOral GC use was highly widespread and increased among adults from 2007 to 2014. The overwhelming short-term use could mainly concern a growing use of unjustified prescriptions rather than situations with a favourable benefit/risk ratio. For chronic users, our findings plead for the development of interventions designed to improve monitoring with regard to the frequent comorbidities at risk and inappropriate prescribing of preventive therapeutic measures.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceGlucocorticoidsHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesYoung AdultGlucocorticoidsdrug utilizationglucocorticoidsinsurance health reimbursementpharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID28760791
PMCPMC5642779
OpenAlexW2741002512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.