Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760757›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Causes and consequences of adult sex ratio imbalance in a historical U.S. population.

Ryan Schacht, Ken R Smith

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. High rates of polygyny do not lock large proportions of men out of the marriage market.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. First Partner Choice in a Native Minority: The Role of Own and Parental Ethnolinguistic Affiliation.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Adult sex ratios and reproductive strategies: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  12. Adult sex ratio and social status predict mating and parenting strategies in Northern Ireland.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  13. Adult sex ratios and partner scarcity among hunter-gatherers: implications for dispersal patterns and the evolution of human sociality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  14. Persistent effect of sex ratios on relationship quality and life satisfaction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  15. Female-biased sex ratios in urban centers create a "fertility trap" in post-war Finland.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan SchachtDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA r.schacht@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-7345
Ken R SmithDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

The Utah Study of Fertility, Longevity and AgingR01AG022095 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SMITH, KEN R · 2003 to 2015
$9.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The responsiveness of individuals to partner availability has been well-documented across the literature. However, there is disagreement regarding the direction of the consequences of sex ratio imbalance. Specifically, does an excess of males or females promote male-male mating competition? In an attempt to clarify the role of the adult sex ratio (ASR) on behaviour, here we evaluate both competing and complimentary expectations derived from theory across the social and biological sciences. We use data drawn from a historical, nineteenth century population in North America and target several life-history traits thought to be affected by partner availability: age at first birth, relationship status, completed fertility and longevity. Furthermore, we assess the role of various contributors to a population's ASR. We find that both the contributors to and consequences of sex ratio imbalance vary over time. Our results largely support predictions of greater male pairbond commitment and lesser male mating effort, as well as elevated bargaining power of women in response to female scarcity. After reviewing our findings, and others from across the literature, we highlight the need to adjust predictions in response to ASR imbalance by the: (i) culturally mediated mating arena, (ii) variable role of demographic inputs across time and place, (iii) constraints to behavioural outcomes across populations, and (iv) ability and accuracy of individuals to assess partner availability.This article is part of the themed issue 'Adult sex ratios and reproductive strategies: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies'.

Indexed as

FertilityLongevityReproductionSex RatioAdultAge FactorsDemographyFemaleHistory, 19th CenturyHumansMaleUtahmating marketsparental investmentreproductionsex ratioUtah Population Database

Identifiers

PMID28760757
PMCPMC5540856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.