Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760755›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection.

Michael D Jennions, Lutz Fromhage

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnosing confounded Bateman gradients.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The evolution of sex roles: The importance of ecology and social environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael D JennionsEcology, Evolution and Genetics, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2600, Australia michael.jennions@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-2788
Lutz FromhageDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla, PO Box 35, 40014, Finland lutzfromhage@web.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-6673
Australian National University · AUUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term 'sex roles' encapsulates male-female differences in mate searching, competitive traits that increase mating/fertilization opportunities, choosiness about mates and parental care. Theoretical models suggest that biased sex ratios drive the evolution of sex roles. To model sex role evolution, it is essential to note that in most sexually reproducing species (haplodiploid insects are an exception), each offspring has one father and one mother. Consequently, the total number of offspring produced by each sex is identical, so the mean number of offspring produced by individuals of each sex depends on the sex ratio (Fisher condition). Similarly, the total number of heterosexual matings is identical for each sex. On average, neither sex can mate nor breed more often when the sex ratio is even. But equally common in

Indexed as

Gender IdentityMaternal BehaviorMating Preference, AnimalPaternal BehaviorSex RatioAnimalsHumansModels, Biologicalanisogamymate choicemating ratesparental caresex allocationsex roles

Identifiers

PMID28760755
PMCPMC5540854
OpenAlexW2739937223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.