Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760619›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2017

Gamma-irradiated human amniotic membrane decellularised with sodium dodecyl sulfate is a more efficient substrate for the ex vivo expansion of limbal stem cells.

G S Figueiredo, S Bojic, P Rooney, S-P Wilshaw, C J Connon, R M Gouveia, C Paterson, G Lepert, H S Mudhar, F C Figueiredo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Corneal Repair and Regeneration: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

G S FigueiredoInstitute for Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK. Electronic address: g.s.m.de-figueiredo@newcastle.ac.uk.
S BojicInstitute for Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK. Electronic address: sanja.bojic@newcastle.ac.uk.
P RooneyTissue Services, NHS Blood and Transplant, 14 Estuary Banks, Speke, Liverpool L24 8RB, UK. Electronic address: paul.rooney@nhsbt.nhs.uk.
S-P WilshawSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK. Electronic address: s.wilshaw@bradford.ac.uk.
C J ConnonInstitute for Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK. Electronic address: che.connon@newcastle.ac.uk.
R M GouveiaInstitute for Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK. Electronic address: ricardo.gouveia@newcastle.ac.uk.
C PatersonThe Blackett Laboratory, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK. Electronic address: carl@imperial.ac.uk.
G LepertThe Blackett Laboratory, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK. Electronic address: guillaume.lepert07@imperial.ac.uk.
H S MudharNational Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK. Electronic address: hardeep.mudhar@sth.nhs.uk.
F C FigueiredoInstitute for Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK. Electronic address: francisco.figueiredo@newcastle.ac.uk.
M LakoInstitute for Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK. Electronic address: majlinda.lako@newcastle.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1215-20037Medical Research Council G0301182Medical Research Council G0900879Medical Research Council MC_PC_15030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standard substrate for the ex vivo expansion of human limbal stem cells (LSCs) remains the human amniotic membrane (HAM) but this is not a defined substrate and is subject to biological variability and the potential to transmit disease. To better define HAM and mitigate the risk of disease transmission, we sought to determine if decellularisation and/or γ-irradiation have an adverse effect on culture growth and LSC phenotype. Ex vivo limbal explant cultures were set up on fresh HAM, HAM decellularised with 0.5M NaOH, and 0.5% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) with or without γ-irradiation. Explant growth rate was measured and LSC phenotype was characterised by histology, immunostaining and qRT-PCR (ABCG2, ΔNp63, Ki67, CK12, and CK13). Ƴ-irradiation marginally stiffened HAM, as measured by Brillouin spectromicroscopy. HAM stiffness and γ-irradiation did not significantly affect the LSC phenotype, however LSCs expanded significantly faster on Ƴ-irradiated SDS decellularised HAM (p<0.05) which was also corroborated by the highest expression of Ki67 and putative LSC marker, ABCG2. Colony forming efficiency assays showed a greater yield and proportion of holoclones in cells cultured on Ƴ-irradiated SDS decellularised HAM. Together our data indicate that SDS decellularised HAM may be a more efficacious substrate for the expansion of LSCs and the use of a γ-irradiated HAM allows the user to start the manufacturing process with a sterile substrate, potentially making it safer. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Despite its disadvantages, including its biological variability and its ability to transfer disease, human amniotic membrane (HAM) remains the gold standard substrate for limbal stem cell (LSC) culture. To address these disadvantages, we used a decellularised HAM sterilised by gamma-irradiation for LSC culture. We cultured LSCs on fresh HAM, HAM decellularised with NaOH, HAM decellularised with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and HAM decellularised with SDS and sterilised with gamma-irradiation. We demonstrated that although HAM decellularised with SDS and sterilised with gamma-irradiation is significantly stiffer this does not affect LSC culture growth rate or the phenotype of cultured LSCs. We therefore recommend the use of SDS decellularised gamma-irradiated HAM in future LSC clinical trials.

Indexed as

Gamma RaysAmnionCell ProliferationCell ShapeColony-Forming Units AssayHumansLimbus CorneaePhenotypeSodium Dodecyl SulfateStem CellsSodium Dodecyl SulfateBrillouin microscopyHuman amniotic membraneLimbal stem cell cultureTissue decellularisation

Identifiers

PMID28760619
PMCPMC5598144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.