Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760483›Full record

Trial reportActa tropica2017

Preliminary efficacy investigations of oral fipronil against Anopheles arabiensis when administered to Zebu cattle (Bos indicus) under field conditions.

Richard M Poché, Naftaly Githaka, Frans van Gool, Rebekah C Kading, Daniel Hartman, Larisa Polyakova, Edward Okoth Abworo, Vishvanath Nene, Saul Lozano-Fuentes

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta tropica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Efficacy of a federally approved flea bait, orally administered to white-footed mice (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Veterinary endectocides for malaria control and elimination: prospects and challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Towards a Sustainable Vector-Control Strategy in the Post Kala-Azar Elimination Era.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard M PochéGenesis Laboratories, Inc., 10122 N.E. Frontage Road, Wellington, CO 80549, USA. Electronic address: richard@genesislabs.com.
Naftaly GithakaInternational Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. Electronic address: n.githaka@cgiar.org.
Frans van GoolEXCELVET-Consultants, Twin Center, Tour Ouest, Angle Boulevard Zerktouni et El Massira 20000, Casablanca, Morocco. Electronic address: frans.vangool@excelvet-consultants.com.
Rebekah C KadingGenesis Laboratories, Inc., 10122 N.E. Frontage Road, Wellington, CO 80549, USA. Electronic address: rebekah.kading@colostate.edu.
Daniel HartmanGenesis Laboratories, Inc., 10122 N.E. Frontage Road, Wellington, CO 80549, USA. Electronic address: daniel@gmail.com.
Larisa PolyakovaGenesis Laboratories, Inc., 10122 N.E. Frontage Road, Wellington, CO 80549, USA. Electronic address: larisap@genesislabs.com.
Edward Okoth AbworoInternational Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. Electronic address: e.okoth@cgiar.org.
Vishvanath NeneInternational Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. Electronic address: v.nene@cgiar.org.
Saul Lozano-FuentesGenesis Laboratories, Inc., 10122 N.E. Frontage Road, Wellington, CO 80549, USA. Electronic address: saul@mosquitoscientists.com.
Genesis Laboratories · USInternational Livestock Research Institute · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, malaria remains one of the most important vector-borne diseases despite the extensive use of vector control, including indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). These control methods target endophagic vectors, whereas some malaria vectors, such as Anopheles arabiensis, preferentially feed outdoors on cattle, making it a complicated vector to control using conventional strategies. Our study evaluated whether treating cattle with a capsule containing the active ingredient (AI) fipronil could reduce vector density and sporozoite rates, and alter blood feeding behavior, when applied in a small-scale field study. A pilot field study was carried out in the Samia District, Western Kenya, from May to July 2015. Four plots, each comprised of 50 huts used for sleeping, were randomly designated to serve as control or treatment. A week before cattle treatment, baseline mosquito collections were performed inside the houses using mechanical aspirators. Animals in the treatment (and buffer) were administered a single oral application of fipronil at ∼0.5mg/kg of body weight. Indoor mosquito collections were performed once a week for four weeks following treatment. Female mosquitoes were first identified morphologically to species complex, followed by PCR-based methods to obtain species identity, sporozoite presence, and the host source of the blood meal. All three species of anophelines found in the study area (An. gambiae s.s., An. arabiensis, An. funestus s.s.) were actively transmitting Plasmodium falciparum during the study period. The indoor resting density of An. arabiensis was significantly reduced in treatment plot one at three weeks post-treatment (T1) (efficacy=89%; T1 density=0.08, 95% credibility intervals [0.05, 0.10]; control plot density=0.78 [0.22, 0.29]) and at four weeks post-treatment (efficacy=64%; T1 density=0.16 [0.08, 0.14]; control plot density=0.48 [0.17, 0.22]). The reduction of An. arabiensis mosquitoes captured in the treatment plot two was higher: zero females were collected after treatment. The indoor resting density of An. gambiae s.s. was not significantly different between the treatment (T1, T2) and their corresponding control plots (C1, C2). An. funestus s.s. showed an increase in density over time. The results of this preliminary study suggest that treating cattle orally with fipronil, to target exophagic and zoophagic malaria vectors, could be a valuable control strategy to supplement existing vector control interventions which target endophilic anthropophilic species.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesCattleFeeding BehaviorInsecticidesInsect VectorsKenyaMalariaMosquito ControlPlasmodium falciparumPyrazolesSporozoitesfipronilInsecticidesPyrazolesKenyaMalariaOne healthSystemic insecticideVector

Identifiers

PMID28760483
PMCPMC5644835
OpenAlexW2742143211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.