Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760208›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal2017

Use of troponin assay 99th percentile as the decision level for myocardial infarction diagnosis.

Akshay Bagai, Karen P Alexander, Jeffrey S Berger, Roxy Senior, Chakkanalil Sajeev, Radoslaw Pracon, Kreton Mavromatis, Jose Luis Lopez-Sendón, Gilbert Gosselin, Ariel Diaz and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interpretating Normal Values and Reference Ranges for Laboratory Tests.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Lessons of the Past and Prospects for the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. High sensitivity Troponin-T for prediction of adverse events in patients with COVID-19.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2020
    Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Akshay BagaiTerrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: bagaia@smh.ca.
Karen P AlexanderDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Jeffrey S BergerNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Roxy SeniorNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK; Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK; Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Chakkanalil SajeevGovernment Medical College Calicut, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Radoslaw PraconCoronary and Structural Heart Diseases Department, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Kreton MavromatisAtlanta VA Medical Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, GA.
Jose Luis Lopez-SendónCardiology department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Idipaz, Madrid, Spain.
Gilbert GosselinInstitut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Ariel DiazUniversity of Montreal, Campus Mauricie, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
Gian PernaCardiology and ICCU-Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
Jarozlaw DrozdzDepartment Cardiology, Medical University, Lodz, Poland.
Dennis HumenUniversity Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
Birute PetrauskieneVilnius University and Vilnius University Hospital "Santariskiu Clinic,", Vilnius, Lithuania.
Asim N CheemaTerrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Denis PhaneufHôpital Pierre-Le Gardeur, Terrebonne, Québec, Canada.
Subhash BanerjeeVeterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Todd D MillerMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sasko KedevUniversity Clinic of Cardiology, Vodnjanska 17, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia.
Herwig SchuchlenzDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care, LHK Graz-Sued/West, Standort West, Graz, Austria.
Gregg W StoneColumbia University Medical Center and The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.
Shaun G GoodmanTerrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Heart Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kenneth W MahaffeyStanford Center for Clinical Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Allan S JaffeMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Yves D RosenbergNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Sripal BangaloreNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
L Kristin NewbyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
David J MaronStanford Center for Clinical Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Judith S HochmanNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Bernard R ChaitmanSt Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
The Ischemia Trial - CCCU01HL105907 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2011 to 2019
$100.1M
The ISCHEMIA-CKD Trial-CCC-Lead ApplicationU01HL117905 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BANGALORE, SRIPAL · 2013 to 2019
$9.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105907NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL117905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction recommends the 99th percentile concentration of cardiac troponin in a normal reference population as part of the decision threshold to diagnose type 1 spontaneous myocardial infarction. Adoption of this recommendation in contemporary worldwide practice is not well known.

methodsWe performed a cohort study of 276 hospital laboratories in 31 countries participating in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches trial. Each hospital laboratory's troponin assay manufacturer and model, the recommended assay's 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) from the manufacturer's package insert, and the troponin concentration used locally as the decision level to diagnose myocardial infarction were ascertained.

resultsTwenty-one unique troponin assays from 9 manufacturers were used by the surveyed hospital laboratories. The ratio of the troponin concentration used locally to diagnose myocardial infarction to the assay manufacturer-determined 99th percentile URL was <1 at 19 (6.6%) laboratories, equal to 1 at 91 (31.6%) laboratories, >1 to ≤5 at 101 (35.1%) laboratories, >5 to ≤10 at 34 (11.8%) laboratories, and >10 at 43 (14.9%) laboratories. The variability in troponin decision level for myocardial infarction relative to the assay 99th percentile URL was present for laboratories in and outside of the United States, as well as for high- and standard-sensitivity assays.

conclusionsThere is substantial hospital-level variation in the troponin threshold used to diagnose myocardial infarction; only one-third of hospital laboratories currently follow the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction consensus recommendation for use of troponin concentration at the 99th percentile of a normal reference population as the decision level to diagnose myocardial infarction. This variability across laboratories has important implications for both the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in clinical practice as well as adjudication of myocardial infarction in clinical trials.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHumansMyocardial InfarctionRetrospective StudiesTroponinUnited StatesBiomarkersTroponin

Identifiers

PMID28760208
PMCPMC5543710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.