Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760180›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health behavior2017

Tobacco Marketing, E-cigarette Susceptibility, and Perceptions among Adults.

Nicole E Nicksic, L Morgan Snell, Alyssa K Rudy, Caroline O Cobb, Andrew J Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Effects of Electronic Cigarette Liquid Flavors and Modified Risk Messages on Perceptions and Subjective Effects of E-Cigarettes.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole E NicksicPost-doctoral Research Fellow, Department of Psychology, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA;, Email: nenicksic@vcu.edu.
L Morgan SnellDoctoral Student, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Alyssa K RudyDoctoral Student, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Caroline O CobbAssistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Andrew J BarnesAssociate Professor, Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Kim Felder Rhoads · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
Training and Education Core p270-287P50DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI EISSENBERG, THOMAS EVAN · 2013 to 2017
$19.2M
Behavior and toxicant exposure among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettesR21CA184634 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI COBB, CAROLINE O · 2014 to 2015
$419k
Effects of cigar flavors on measures of abuse liability among young adultsR03DA043005 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BARNES, ANDREW JAMES · 2016 to 2017
$229k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059NCI NIH HHS R21 CA184634NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036105NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA043005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUnderstanding the impact of tobacco marketing on e-cigarette (EC) susceptibility and perceptions is essential to inform efforts to mitigate tobacco product burden on public health.

methodsData were collected online in 2016 from 634 conventional cigarette (CC) smokers and 393 non-smokers using a convenience sample from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Logistic regression models, stratified by smoking status and adjusted for socio-demographics, examined the relationship among tobacco advertisements and coupons, EC and CC susceptibility, and EC perceptions.

resultsAmong non-smokers, increased exposure to tobacco advertising and receiving tobacco coupons was significantly related to measures of EC and CC susceptibility (p < .05). Older, more educated non-smokers had decreased odds of EC susceptibility (p < .05). Additionally, increased exposure to tobacco advertising was significantly associated with the perceptions of EC not containing nicotine and being less addictive than CC among smokers (p < .05).

conclusionsIncreased exposure to tobacco advertising outlets could influence future EC and CC use in non-smokers and perceptions in smokers, while receiving coupons could affect EC and CC susceptibility among non-smokers. Future research is needed to determine whether policies to minimize exposure to tobacco marketing reduce EC use by decreasing susceptibility.

Indexed as

AdvertisingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdultFemaleHumansMaleSmoking

Identifiers

PMID28760180
PMCPMC5725962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.