Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28760100›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2017

The Utility of Outpatient Commitment: I. A Need for Treatment and a Least Restrictive Alternative to Psychiatric Hospitalization.

Steven P Segal, Stephania L Hayes, Lachlan Rimes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 'Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me': Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Ensuring compulsory treatment is used as a last resort: a narrative review of the knowledge about Community Treatment Orders.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Community Treatment Orders use Among Persons With a First Episode of Psychosis in Quebec.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The utility of outpatient commitment: Reduced-risks of victimization and crime perpetration.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Coercion in Outpatients under Community Treatment Orders: A Matched Comparison Study.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven P SegalDr. Segal and Ms. Hayes are with the School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Segal is also with the Department of Social Work, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Mr. Rimes is with the Victoria Department of Health and Human Services, Melbourne.
Stephania L HayesDr. Segal and Ms. Hayes are with the School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Segal is also with the Department of Social Work, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Mr. Rimes is with the Victoria Department of Health and Human Services, Melbourne.
Lachlan RimesDr. Segal and Ms. Hayes are with the School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Segal is also with the Department of Social Work, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Mr. Rimes is with the Victoria Department of Health and Human Services, Melbourne.

Funding

TRAINING IN MENTAL HEALTH FINANCE &SERVICE DELIVERYT32MH018828 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SEGAL, STEVEN P · 1987 to 2001
$596k
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined whether psychiatric patients assigned to community treatment orders (CTOs), outpatient commitment in Victoria, Australia, have a greater need for treatment to protect their health and safety than patients not assigned to CTOs. It also considered whether such treatment is provided in a least restrictive manner-that is, in a way that contributes to reduced use of psychiatric hospitalization.

methodsThe sample included 11,424 patients first placed on a CTO between 2000 and 2010, and 16,161 patients not placed on a CTO. Need for treatment was independently assessed with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) at hospital admission and at discharge. Ordinary least-squares and Poisson regressions were used to assess savings in hospital days attributable to CTO placement.

resultsHoNOS ratings indicated that at admission and discharge, the CTO cohort's need for treatment exceeded that of the non-CTO cohort, particularly in areas indicating potential dangerous behavior. When analyses adjusted for the propensity to be selected into the CTO cohort and other factors, the mean duration of an inpatient episode was 4.6 days shorter for the CTO cohort than for the non-CTO cohort, and a reduction of 10.4 days per inpatient episode was attributable to each CTO placement.

conclusionsCTO placement may have helped patients with a greater need for treatment to experience shorter hospital stays. Whether the CTO directly enabled the fulfillment of unsought but required treatment needs that protected patient health and safety is a question that needs to be addressed in future research.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCommitment of Persons with Psychiatric DisordersCommunity Mental Health ServicesDeinstitutionalizationFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareVictoriaInvoluntary commitment, Outpatient commitment, Admissions &ampreadmissions, Civil law, Deinstitutionalization

Identifiers

PMID28760100
PMCPMC7138506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.