ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2017
The Utility of Outpatient Commitment: II. Mortality Risk and Protecting Health, Safety, and Quality of Life.
Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The benefits and harms of community treatment orders for people diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses: A rapid umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Community Treatment Orders in Australia in the Context of International Literature: A Narrative Review of Consumers, Families and Health Professionals' Perspectives.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Review
- Latest findings highlight the continuing uncertainty over the utility of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community.BJPsych open · 2024Article
- The association between Compulsory Community Treatment Order status and mortality in New Zealand.BJPsych open · 2023Article
- Mortality-Risk With "Capacity" Constraints On Community Treatment Order Utilization.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2023Article
- Protecting Health and Safety with Needed-Treatment: the Effectiveness of Outpatient Commitment.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2022Review
- Accessing acute medical care to protect health: the utility of community treatment orders.General psychiatry · 2022Article
- Different Patient Group Responses To Community Treatment Orders Suggest Alternative Approaches.Professional development (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020Article
- Service Users' Knowledge and Views on Outpatients' Compulsory Community Treatment Orders: A Cross-Sectional Matched Comparison Study.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2019Article
- The utility of outpatient commitment: Reduced-risks of victimization and crime perpetration.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2019Article
- The utility of outpatient commitment: acute medical care access and protecting health.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2018Article
- The utility of outpatient civil commitment: Investigating the evidence.International journal of law and psychiatryReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study assessed the contribution of a form of outpatient commitment-community treatment orders (CTOs)-to mortality risk and quality of life of patients with severe mental illness.
methodsData (2000--2012) were obtained from the Australian National Death Index, Victoria Department of Health, Victoria police records, and National Outcomes and CaseMix Collection quality-of-life records for patients in the Victorian Psychiatric Case Register/RAPID with a history of psychiatric hospitalization: CTO cohort, N=11,424; non-CTO cohort, N=16,161. The contribution of CTOs to mortality risk associated with CTO facilitation of access to general medical care and prevention of criminal involvement was assessed with logistic regression models. Cohort differences in quality of life were also examined.
resultsA total of 2,727 patients (10%) in the overall sample died, and the sample had a higher mortality risk than the general population. Probability of death by any cause was 9% lower in the CTO cohort than in the non-CTO cohort. Facilitation of access to medical care accounted for a 20% reduction in risk of non-injury-related deaths in the CTO cohort, compared with the non-CTO cohort. Risk of death by self-harm was 32% higher, compared with the non-CTO cohort. CTO placement appeared to lead to a gain of 3.8 years of life among men and 2.4 years among women, compared with the non-CTO cohort. Quality-of-life scores were modestly less favorable for the non-CTO cohort.
conclusionsCTO placement was associated with lower mortality risk via facilitated access to medical care and with modest enhancement of quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.