ArticleJAMA pediatrics2017
Early-Life Epilepsies and the Emerging Role of Genetic Testing.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Barriers to the implementation of epilepsy genetic testing and counseling guidelines.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Genomic insights into autosomal recessive epilepsy: novel pathogenic variants in ITPA and CLN5 identified in consanguineous families.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Synergy in Child Neurology: Science, Collaboration, and Leadership - The 2024 Hower Award Lecture.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2025Article
- Genotype-function-phenotype correlations for SCN1A variants identified by clinical genetic testing.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Factors impacting time to genetic diagnosis for children with epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
- VPS13D affects epileptic seizures by regulating mitochondrial fission and autophagy in epileptic rats.Genes & diseases · 2024Article
- Utility of Genome Sequencing After Nondiagnostic Exome Sequencing in Unexplained Pediatric Epilepsy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Expanded clinical phenotype spectrum correlates with variant function in SCN2A-related disorders.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Accessibility, availability and common practices regarding genetic testing for epilepsy across Europe: A survey of the European Reference Network EpiCARE.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
- Questions and Controversies in Neonatal Seizures.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood: Current Understanding.Pediatric emergency care · 2023Article
- Predicting Language in Children with ASD Using Spontaneous Language Samples and Standardized Measures.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2023Article
- Genetic Diagnosis Impacts Medical Management for Pediatric Epilepsies.Pediatric neurology · 2023Article
- Prospective evaluation of NGS-based sequencing in epilepsy patients: results of seven NASGE-associated diagnostic laboratories.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Analysis of deaths following yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccination of infants, China, January 2013 to December 2020.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Clinical and genetic analysis of benign familial infantile epilepsy caused byFrontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies - therapeutic consequences of genetic testing.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2022Article
- Genetic Testing and Hospital Length of Stay in Neonates With Epilepsy.Pediatric neurology · 2022Article
- Value of genetic testing for pediatric epilepsy: Driving earlier diagnosis of ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 Batten disease.Epilepsia · 2022Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Early-life epilepsies are often a consequence of numerous neurodevelopmental disorders, most of which are proving to have genetic origins. The role of genetic testing in the initial evaluation of these epilepsies is not established. Objective: To provide a contemporary account of the patterns of use and diagnostic yield of genetic testing for early-life epilepsies. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective cohort, children with newly diagnosed epilepsy with an onset at less than 3 years of age were recruited from March 1, 2012, to April 30, 2015, from 17 US pediatric hospitals and followed up for 1 year. Of 795 families approached, 775 agreed to participate. Clinical diagnosis of the etiology of epilepsy were characterized based on information available before genetic testing was performed. Added contributions of cytogenetic and gene sequencing investigations were determined. Exposures: Genetic diagnostic testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Laboratory-confirmed pathogenic variant. Results: Of the 775 patients in the study (367 girls and 408 boys; median age of onset, 7.5 months [interquartile range, 4.2-16.5 months]), 95 (12.3%) had acquired brain injuries. Of the remaining 680 patients, 327 (48.1%) underwent various forms of genetic testing, which identified pathogenic variants in 132 of 327 children (40.4%; 95% CI, 37%-44%): 26 of 59 (44.1%) with karyotyping, 32 of 188 (17.0%) with microarrays, 31 of 114 (27.2%) with epilepsy panels, 11 of 33 (33.3%) with whole exomes, 4 of 20 (20.0%) with mitochondrial panels, and 28 of 94 (29.8%) with other tests. Forty-four variants were identified before initial epilepsy presentation. Apart from dysmorphic syndromes, pathogenic yields were highest for children with tuberous sclerosis complex (9 of 11 [81.8%]), metabolic diseases (11 of 14 [78.6%]), and brain malformations (20 of 61 [32.8%]). A total of 180 of 446 children (40.4%), whose etiology would have remained unknown without genetic testing, underwent some testing. Pathogenic variants were identified in 48 of 180 children (26.7%; 95% CI, 18%-34%). Diagnostic yields were greater than 15% regardless of delay, spasms, and young age. Yields were greater for epilepsy panels (28 of 96 [29.2%]; P < .001) and whole exomes (5 of 18 [27.8%]; P = .02) than for chromosomal microarray (8 of 101 [7.9%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Genetic investigations, particularly broad sequencing methods, have high diagnostic yields in newly diagnosed early-life epilepsies regardless of key clinical features. Thorough genetic investigation emphasizing sequencing tests should be incorporated into the initial evaluation of newly presenting early-life epilepsies and not just reserved for those with severe presentations and poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.