Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28759602›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Risk factors for inadequate antibody response to primary rabies vaccination in dogs under one year of age.

Ryan M Wallace, Anna Pees, Jesse B Blanton, Susan M Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rabies in a Dog Imported from Azerbaijan - Pennsylvania, 2021.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan M WallacePoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Anna PeesRabies Laboratory, Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Kansas State University Rabies Laboratory, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Jesse B BlantonPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Susan M MooreRabies Laboratory, Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Kansas State University Rabies Laboratory, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5114-6005
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USKansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring the adequacy of response to rabies vaccination in dogs is important, particularly in the context of pet travel. Few studies have examined the factors associated with dogs' failure to achieve an adequate antibody titer after vaccination (0.5 IU/ml). This study evaluated rabies antibody titers in dogs after primary vaccination. Dogs under one year of age whose serum was submitted to a reference laboratory for routine diagnostics, and which had no prior documented history of vaccination were enrolled (n = 8,011). Geometric mean titers (GMT) were calculated and univariate analysis was performed to assess factors associated with failure to achieve 0.5 IU/mL. Dogs vaccinated at >16 weeks of age had a significantly higher GMT compared to dogs vaccinated at a younger age (1.64 IU/ml, 1.57-1.72, ANOVA p < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in GMT between dogs vaccinated <12 weeks and dogs vaccinated 12-16 weeks (1.22 IU/ml and 1.21 IU/ml). The majority of dogs failed to reach an adequate titer within the first 3 days of primary vaccination; failure rates were also high if the interval from vaccination to titer check was greater than 90 days. Over 90% of dogs that failed primary vaccination were able to achieve adequate titers after booster vaccination. The ideal timing for blood draw is 8-30 days after primary vaccination. In the event of a failure, most dogs will achieve an adequate serologic response upon a repeat titer (in the absence of booster vaccination). Booster vaccination after failure provided the highest probability of an acceptable titer.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAnimalsAntibodies, ViralDog DiseasesDogsFemaleImmunization, SecondaryLinear ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisRabiesRabies VaccinesRisk FactorsTime FactorsUnited StatesAntibodies, ViralRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID28759602
PMCPMC5552338
OpenAlexW2740484190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.