Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28759586›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Apology in cases of medical error disclosure: Thoughts based on a preliminary study.

Sonia Dahan, Dominique Ducard, Laurence Caeymaex

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychology insights on apologizing to patients.Journal of hospital medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Why Are Patients Unhappy with Their Healthcare? A Romanian Physicians' Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sonia DahanNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Dominique DucardCéditec EA 3119, Université Paris Est Créteil UPEC, Créteil, France.
Laurence CaeymaexNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-5136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisclosing medical errors is considered necessary by patients, ethicists, and health care professionals. Literature insists on the framing of this disclosure and describes the apology as appropriate and necessary. However, this policy seems difficult to put into practice. Few works have explored the function and meaning of the apology.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the role ascribed to apology in communication between healthcare professionals and patients when disclosing a medical error, and to discuss these findings using a linguistic and philosophical perspective.

methodsQualitative exploratory study, based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews, with seven physicians in a neonatal unit in France. Discourse analysis.

resultsFour themes emerged. Difference between apology in everyday life and in the medical encounter; place of the apology in the process of disclosure together with explanations, regrets, empathy and ways to avoid repeating the error; effects of the apology were to allow the patient-physician relationship undermined by the error, to be maintained, responsibility to be accepted, the first steps towards forgiveness to be taken, and a less hierarchical doctor-patient relationship to be created; ways of expressing apology ("I am sorry") reflected regrets and empathy more than an explicit apology.

conclusionThis study highlights how the act of apology can be seen as a "language act" as described by philosophers Austin and Searle, and how it functions as a technique for making amends following a wrongdoing and as an action undertaken in order that neither party should lose face, thus echoing the sociologist Goffmann's interaction theory. This interpretation also accords with the views of Lazare, for whom the function of apology is a restoration of dignity after the humiliation of the error. This approach to the apology illustrates how meaning and impact of real-life language acts can be clarified by philosophical and sociological ideas.

Indexed as

ForgivenessMedical ErrorsNeonatologyPhysician-Patient RelationsTruth DisclosureAdultCommunicationEmotionsEmpathyEthics, MedicalFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID28759586
PMCPMC5536280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.