ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2017
Evidence-based management of adult patients with diffuse glioma.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reasoning and causal inference regarding surgical options for patients with low-grade gliomas using machine learning: A SEER-based study.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- A Personalized Longitudinal Strategy in Low-Grade Glioma Patients: Predicting Oncological and Neural Interindividual Variability and Its Changes over Years to Think One Step Ahead.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Repeated Awake Surgical Resection(s) for Recurrent Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas: Why, When, and How to Reoperate?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- What Does Quality of Care Mean in Lower-Grade Glioma Patients: A Precision Molecular-Based Management of the Tumor or an Individualized Medicine Centered on Patient's Choices?Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- Chemotherapy and diffuse low-grade gliomas: a survey within the European Low-Grade Glioma Network.Neuro-oncology practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28759376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.