Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28759306›Full record

ArticleCell adhesion & migration2018

Skeletal muscle regeneration involves macrophage-myoblast bonding.

Laura Cristina Ceafalan, Tudor Emanuel Fertig, Alexandru Cristian Popescu, Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu, Mihail Eugen Hinescu, Mihaela Gherghiceanu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell adhesion & migration, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The Many Roles of Macrophages in Skeletal Muscle Injury and Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Telocytes: An Emerging Component of Stem Cell Niche Microenvironment.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2021
    Review
  14. Fusion and beyond: Satellite cell contributions to loading-induced skeletal muscle adaptation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Cristina Ceafalana Ultrastructural Pathology Laboratory , Victor Babes National Institute of Pathology , Bucharest , Romania.
Tudor Emanuel Fertiga Ultrastructural Pathology Laboratory , Victor Babes National Institute of Pathology , Bucharest , Romania.
Alexandru Cristian Popescua Ultrastructural Pathology Laboratory , Victor Babes National Institute of Pathology , Bucharest , Romania.
Bogdan Ovidiu Popescua Ultrastructural Pathology Laboratory , Victor Babes National Institute of Pathology , Bucharest , Romania.
Mihail Eugen Hinescua Ultrastructural Pathology Laboratory , Victor Babes National Institute of Pathology , Bucharest , Romania.
Mihaela Gherghiceanua Ultrastructural Pathology Laboratory , Victor Babes National Institute of Pathology , Bucharest , Romania.
Institutul National Victor Babes · ROCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration in adult skeletal muscle relies on the activation, proliferation, and fusion of myogenic precursor cells (MPC), mostly resident satellite cells (SC). However, the regulatory mechanism during this process is still under evaluation, with the final aim to manipulate regeneration when the intrinsic mechanism is corrupted. Furthermore, intercellular connections during skeletal muscle regeneration have not been previously thoroughly documented. Our hypothesis was that a direct and close cellular interaction between SC/MPC and invading myeloid cells is a key step to control regeneration. We tested this hypothesis during different steps of skeletal muscle regeneration: (a) the recruitment of activated SC; (b) the differentiation of MPC; (c) myotubes growth, in a mouse model of crush injury. Samples harvested (3 and 5 days) post-injury were screened by light and confocal microscopy. Ultrastructural analysis was performed by conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) followed by 3D modeling of electron tomography (ET) data. This revealed a new type of interaction between macrophages and myogenic cells by direct heterocellular surface apposition over large areas and long linear distances. In the analyzed volume, regions spaced below 20 nm, within molecular range, represented 31% of the macrophage membrane surface and more than 27% of the myotube membrane. The constant interaction throughout all stages of myogenesis suggests a potential new type of regulatory mechanism for the myogenic process. Thus, deciphering structural and molecular mechanisms of SC-macrophage interaction following injury might open promising perspectives for improving muscle healing.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedMacrophagesMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle DevelopmentMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalMyoblastsRegenerationelectron tomographyintercellular contactsmacrophagemyogenic cellsscanning transmission electron microscopyskeletal muscle regenerationsurface apposition

Identifiers

PMID28759306
PMCPMC6149487
OpenAlexW2739729129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.