Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28758346›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2018

Direct detection and characterization of foot-and-mouth disease virus in East Africa using a field-ready real-time PCR platform.

E L A Howson, B Armson, N A Lyons, E Chepkwony, C J Kasanga, S Kandusi, N Ndusilo, W Yamazaki, D Gizaw, S Cleaveland and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Easy Express Extraction (TripleMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. "FastCheckViruses · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

E L A HowsonThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-1901
B ArmsonThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
N A LyonsThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
E ChepkwonyFoot-and-Mouth Disease Laboratory, Embakasi, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Blue Economy, Nairobi, Kenya.
C J KasangaDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary and Medical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.
S KandusiDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary and Medical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.
N NdusiloDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary and Medical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.
W YamazakiDepartment of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7874-8014
D GizawNational Animal Health Diagnostic & Investigation Centre, Sebeta, Oromia, Ethiopia.
S CleavelandInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
T LemboInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
R RauhTetracore Inc, Rockville, MD, USA.
W M NelsonTetracore Inc, Rockville, MD, USA.
B A WoodThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
V MiouletThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
D P KingThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
V L FowlerThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
The Pirbright Institute · GBSokoine University of Agriculture · TZTetracore (United States) · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBMinistry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries · KEOromiyaa Regional Health Bureau · ETUniversity of Miyazaki · JP

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007036Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007037Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective control and monitoring of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) relies upon rapid and accurate disease confirmation. Currently, clinical samples are usually tested in reference laboratories using standardized assays recommended by The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). However, the requirements for prompt and serotype-specific diagnosis during FMD outbreaks, and the need to establish robust laboratory testing capacity in FMD-endemic countries have motivated the development of simple diagnostic platforms to support local decision-making. Using a portable thermocycler, the T-COR™ 8, this study describes the laboratory and field evaluation of a commercially available, lyophilized pan-serotype-specific real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assay and a newly available FMD virus (FMDV) typing assay (East Africa-specific for serotypes: O, A, Southern African Territories [SAT] 1 and 2). Analytical sensitivity, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the pan-serotype-specific lyophilized assay were comparable to that of an OIE-recommended laboratory-based rRT-PCR (determined using a panel of 57 FMDV-positive samples and six non-FMDV vesicular disease samples for differential diagnosis). The FMDV-typing assay was able to correctly identify the serotype of 33/36 FMDV-positive samples (no cross-reactivity between serotypes was evident). Furthermore, the assays were able to accurately detect and type FMDV RNA in multiple sample types, including epithelial tissue suspensions, serum, oesophageal-pharyngeal (OP) fluid and oral swabs, both with and without the use of nucleic acid extraction. When deployed in laboratory and field settings in Tanzania, Kenya and Ethiopia, both assays reliably detected and serotyped FMDV RNA in samples (n = 144) collected from pre-clinical, clinical and clinically recovered cattle. These data support the use of field-ready rRT-PCR platforms in endemic settings for simple, highly sensitive and rapid detection and/or characterization of FMDV.

Indexed as

Africa, EasternAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesDisease OutbreaksFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificitySerogroupSerotypingRNA, Viraldiagnosticsdisease controlfoot-and-mouth diseasefoot-and-mouth disease viruslyophilizedrRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID28758346
PMCPMC5811823
OpenAlexW2740371489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.