ArticleStatistics in medicine2017
A method to address between-subject heterogeneity for identification of principal surrogate markers in repeated low-dose challenge HIV vaccine studies.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Repeated low-dose challenge designs in nonhuman primate studies have recently received attention in the literature as a means of evaluating vaccines for HIV prevention and identifying immune surrogates for their protective effects. Existing methods for surrogate identification in this type of study design rely on the assumption of homogeneity across subjects (namely, independent infection risks after each challenge within each subject and conditional on covariates). In practice, random variation across subjects is likely to occur because of unmeasured biologic factors. Failure to account for this heterogeneity or within-subject correlation can result in biased inference regarding the surrogate value of immune biomarkers and underpowered study designs for detecting surrogate endpoints. In this paper, we adopt a discrete-time survival model with random effects to account for between-subject heterogeneity, and we develop estimators and testing procedures for evaluating principal surrogacy of immune biomarkers. Simulation studies reveal that the heterogeneous model achieves substantial bias reduction compared to the homogeneous model, with little cost of efficiency. We recommend the use of this heterogeneous model as a complementary tool to existing methods when designing and analyzing repeated low-dose challenge studies for evaluating surrogate endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.