ReviewBioMed research international2017
Neurocardiology: Cardiovascular Changes and Specific Brain Region Infarcts.
Review in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Motor induced syncope after cerebral infarction: A case report and literature review.SAGE open medical case reports · 2025Article
- Sympathetic overactivation and catecholamine toxicity: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for neurogenic heart injury following acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Cardiac Function in Patients with Supratentorial Tumors and Raised Intracranial Pressure: HABIT-ICP, a Prospective Observational Study Using Transthoracic Echocardiography.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Reduced Heartbeat-Evoked Responses in a Near-Death Case Report.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Cerebral infarction after cardiac surgery.Ibrain · 2022Review
- Patient periprocedural stress in cardiovascular medicine: friend or foe?Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2021Review
- Brain and heart-specific death in cancer patients: Population-based study.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Cerebrovascular insufficiency and amyloidogenic signaling in Ossabaw swine with cardiometabolic heart failure.JCI insight · 2021Article
- Effects of epidural block anesthesia combined with general anesthesia on inflammatory factors, cognitive function and postoperative pain in patients with lung cancer after thoracoscopic surgery.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Prokineticin signaling in heart-brain developmental axis: Therapeutic options for heart and brain injuries.Pharmacological research · 2020Review
- Stress and Inflammation in Coronary Artery Disease: A Review Psychoneuroendocrineimmunology-Based.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are complex and dynamic reflex control networks between the heart and the brain, including cardiac and intrathoracic ganglia, spinal cord, brainstem, and central nucleus. Recent literature based on animal model and clinical trials indicates a close link between cardiac function and nervous systems. It is noteworthy that the autonomic nervous-based therapeutics has shown great potential in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmia, and myocardial remodeling. However, the potential mechanisms of postoperative brain injury and cardiovascular changes, particularly heart rate variability and the presence of arrhythmias, are not understood. In this chapter, we will describe mechanisms of brain damage undergoing cardiac surgery and focus on the interaction between cardiovascular changes and damage to specific brain regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.