Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28757868›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2017

Katarzyna Gorowska-Kowolik, Agata Chobot, Jaroslaw Kwiecien

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Comparison ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. On the relationship between metabolic capacities andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Outcomes and potential surrogate markers for future clinical trials of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Induced volatolomics of pathologies.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2021
    Review
  14. (JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring Liver Mitochondrial Function byMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  17. A novel variant of theArchives of toxicology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Breath test usingBMC gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna Gorowska-KowolikDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Hospital No. 1, Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2439-0931
Agata ChobotDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Hospital No. 1, Zabrze, Poland.
Jaroslaw KwiecienDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-8261
Central Clinical Hospital · PLMedical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of the liver function, and the need of constant monitoring of the organ's capacity, concerns not only patients with primary liver diseases, but also those at risk of hepatopathies secondary to other chronic diseases. Most commonly, the diagnostics is based on measurements of static biochemical parameters, which allow us to draw conclusions only indirectly about the function and the degree of damage of the organ. On the other hand, liver biopsy is an invasive procedure and therefore it is associated with a considerable risk of complications. Dynamic tests enable us to assess quantitatively the organ's functional reserve by analyzing the kinetics of the metabolization of the substrate by the liver. In practice applied are breath tests using substances such as aminopyrine, caffeine, methacetin, erythromycin (for assessment of the microsomal function); phenylalanine, galactose (for assessment of the cytosolic function); methionine, octanoate, ketoisocaproic acid (for assessment of the mitochondrial function). The test with

Identifiers

PMID28757868
PMCPMC5516731
OpenAlexW2724675302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.