Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28757795›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2017

A New Model to Study Fatigue in Dental Implants Based on Probabilistic Finite Elements and Cumulative Damage Model.

María Prados-Privado, José Antonio Bea, Rosa Rojo, Sérgio A Gehrke, José Luis Calvo-Guirado, Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

María Prados-PrivadoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0833-0680
José Antonio BeaUniversity of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Rosa RojoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7400-902X
Sérgio A GehrkeBiotecnos Research Center, Montevideo, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-9101
José Luis Calvo-GuiradoFaculty of Medicine & Dentistry, San Antonio Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain.
Juan Carlos Prados-FrutosDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-0968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to predict the fatigue life of two different connections of a dental implant as in load transfer to bone. Two three-dimensional models were created and assembled. All models were subjected to a natural masticatory force of 118 N in the angle of 75° to the occlusal plane. All degrees of freedom in the inferior border of the cortical bone were restrained, and the mesial and distal borders of the end of the bone section were constrained. Fatigue material data and loads were assumed as random variables. Maximum principal stresses on bone were evaluated. Then, the probability of failure was obtained by the probabilistic approach. The maximum principal stress distribution predicted in the cortical and trabecular bone is 32 MPa for external connection and 39 MPa for internal connection. A mean life of 103 and 210 million cycles were obtained for external and internal connection, respectively. Probability cumulative function was also evaluated for both connection types. This stochastic model employs a cumulative damage model and probabilistic finite element method. This methodology allows the possibility of measured uncertainties and has a good precision on the results.

Identifiers

PMID28757795
PMCPMC5516717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.