ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2017
A Heart Failure Management Program Using Shared Medical Appointments.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shared Medical Appointments in Heart Failure for Post Acute Care Follow-Up: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Training providers to implement heart failure shared medical appointments: A qualitative evaluation.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisease management programs for heart failure (HF) effectively reduce HF-related hospitalization rates and mortality. Shared medical appointments (SMAs) offer a cost-effective delivery method for HF disease management programs. However, few studies have evaluated this cost-effective delivery method of HF disease management among Veterans with acute HF. We hypothesized that Veterans who attended a multidisciplinary HF-SMA clinic promoting HF self-management, compared those who only received individual treatment through the HF specialty clinic, would have better 12-month hospitalization outcomes.
methodsWe completed a retrospective review of the VA electronic health record for HF-SMA clinic appointments (1/1/2012 to 12/31/2013). The multidisciplinary HF-SMA program comprised 4 weekly sessions covering topics including HF disease, HF medications, diet adherence, physical activity, psychological well-being, and stress management. Patients who attended the HF-SMA clinic (
resultsOf 141 patients scheduled for an HF-SMA clinic appointment, 54 met criteria for the HF-SMA clinic group and 37 were included in the HF clinic group. The groups did not significantly differ on any sociodemographic variables. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the HF-SMA group and the HF clinic group on demographics or hospitalization outcomes,
conclusionsOur results did not support our hypothesis that offering multidisciplinary, HF-SMAs promoting HF self-management skills, above and beyond the individual disease management care provided in an HF specialty clinic, would improve hospitalization outcomes among Veterans with acute HF. Limitations of the present study and recommendations for HF self-management programs for Veterans are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28757792PMC5526219W3010780835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.