Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28757679›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology and sociobiology

Acoustic ranging in poison frogs-it is not about signal amplitude alone.

Max Ringler, Georgine Szipl, Walter Hödl, Leander Khil, Barbara Kofler, Michael Lonauer, Christina Provin, Eva Ringler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology and sociobiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta-analysis.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Repeatable Territorial Aggression in a Neotropical Poison Frog.Frontiers in ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Listening in the bog: I. Acoustic interactions and spacing between males of Sphagniana sphagnorum.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Max RinglerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4530-4919
Georgine SziplDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Walter HödlDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Leander KhilDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Barbara KoflerDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Michael LonauerDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christina ProvinDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Eva RinglerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606 USA.
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3868Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24788Austrian Science Fund FWF T 699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAcoustic ranging allows identifying the distance of a sound source and mediates inter-individual spacing and aggression in territorial species. Birds and mammals are known to use more complex cues than only sound pressure level (SPL), which can be influenced by the signaller and signal transmission in non-predictable ways and thus is not reliable by itself. For frogs, only SPL is currently known to mediate inter-individual distances, but we hypothesise that the strong territoriality of Dendrobatids could make the use of complex cues for ranging highly beneficial for this family. Therefore, we tested the ranging abilities of territorial males of SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Acoustic ranging allows the distance of vocalizing competitors and mates to be identified. While birds and mammals are known to use complex cues such as temporal degradation, frequency-dependent attenuation and reverberation for ranging, previous research indicated that frogs rely only on signal amplitude (sound pressure level) to assess the distance of other callers. The present study shows for the first time that also poison frogs can make use of more complex cues, an ability which is likely to be highly beneficial in their territorial social organization and probably can also be used for orientation.

Indexed as

Acoustic rangingPlayback experimentPoison frogsSignal-to-noise ratioSNRSPLTerritoriality

Identifiers

PMID28757679
PMCPMC5506510
OpenAlexW2735693899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.