Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28757648›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2017

Prediction of antibiotic resistance: time for a new preclinical paradigm?

Morten O A Sommer, Christian Munck, Rasmus Vendler Toft-Kehler, Dan I Andersson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Annotation of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Implications From the Analogous Relationship Between Evolutionary and Learning Processes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Chimeric hBPIArchives of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Food substances alter gut resistome: Mechanisms, health impacts, and food components.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morten O A SommerAntibioTx A/S, Kemitorvet, Lyngby DK-2800, Denmark; and at The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby DK-2800, Denmark.
Christian MunckThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby DK-2800, Denmark.
Rasmus Vendler Toft-KehlerAntibioTx A/S, Kemitorvet, Lyngby DK-2800, Denmark.
Dan I AnderssonUppsala University, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Husargatan 3, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the future is difficult, especially for evolutionary processes that are influenced by numerous unknown factors. Still, this is what is required of drug developers when they assess the risk of resistance arising against a new antibiotic candidate during preclinical development. In this Opinion article, we argue that the traditional procedures that are used for the prediction of antibiotic resistance today could be markedly improved by including a broader analysis of bacterial fitness, infection dynamics, horizontal gene transfer and other factors. This will lead to more informed preclinical decisions for continuing or discontinuing the development of drug candidates.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEvolution, MolecularGene Transfer, HorizontalHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.