ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2017
Electrophysiological Assessment for Splinting in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Mapping Neurophysiological Patterns in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Correlations With Tinel's and Phalen's Signs.Cureus · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Existing Electrophysiological Severity Classifications in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Prognostic factors in carpal tunnel syndrome treated with 5% dextrose perineural injection: A retrospective study.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An electrophysiological study is commonly used to decide a therapeutic strategy for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In this study, the electrophysiological parameter measurement as a prognostic indicator for CTS after wrist splinting was assessed to identify appropriate candidates for wrist splinting for CTS. One hundred and six hands in 78 patients with CTS were treated by wrist splinting, and three electrophysiological parameters; median distal motor latency (DML) of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle, median distal sensory latency (DSL) of the index finger, and second lumbrical-interossei latency difference (2L-INT LD); were statistically analyzed to compare with clinical results by Kelly's evaluation respectively. Clinical results were excellent in 15 hands, good in 51 hands, fair in 19 hands, and poor in 21 hands. The recordable rate in 2L-INT LD (99.1%) was higher than DML (96.2%) and DSL (79.2%). Patients with DML less than 6.5 ms, DSL less than 5.7 ms, or 2L-INT LD less than 2.5 ms had significantly excellent or good clinical results. The odds ratios of the DML, DSL, and the 2L-INT LD were 7.93, 8.81, and 12.8, respectively. This study demonstrated that CTS patients with DML less than 6.5 ms, DSL less than 5.7 ms, or 2L-INT less than 2.5 ms were good candidates for wrist splinting. Especially, the 2L-INT LD could be the most reliable indicator to predict clinical results for all grades of CTS. This electrophysiological information could be useful in further improvement of accurate diagnosis of CTS, and may help in the assessment of appropriate treatment for CTS with wrist splinting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.