Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28756951›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

Piercing of Consciousness as a Threshold-Crossing Operation.

Yul H R Kang, Frederike H Petzschner, Daniel M Wolpert, Michael N Shadlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of Decision-Related Signals in Sensory and Motor Preparatory Responses of Neurons in Area LIP.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  19. Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yul H R KangDepartment of Neuroscience, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Frederike H PetzschnerTranslational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel M WolpertComputational and Biological Learning Laboratory, Department of Engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
Michael N ShadlenDepartment of Neuroscience, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Kavli Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: shadlen@columbia.edu.

Funding

Instrumentation, Fabrication, and Design CoreP30EY019007 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Xin Zhang · 2010 to 2026
$12.9M
Vision Sciences Training GrantT32EY013933 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Carol A. Mason, CAROL M TROY · 2001 to 2026
$5.3M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF VISUAL PERCEPTIONR01EY011378 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHADLEN, MICHAEL NEIL · 1996 to 2017
$3.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019007NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011378NEI NIH HHS T32 EY013933Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many decisions arise through an accumulation of evidence to a terminating threshold. The process, termed bounded evidence accumulation (or drift diffusion), provides a unified account of decision speed and accuracy, and it is supported by neurophysiology in human and animal models. In many situations, a decision maker may not communicate a decision immediately and yet feel that at some point she had made up her mind. We hypothesized that this occurs when an accumulation of evidence reaches a termination threshold, registered, subjectively, as an "aha" moment. We asked human participants to make perceptual decisions about the net direction of dynamic random dot motion. The difficulty and viewing duration were controlled by the experimenter. After indicating their choice, participants adjusted the setting of a clock to the moment they felt they had reached a decision. The subjective decision times (t

Indexed as

ConsciousnessDecision MakingMotion PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleconsciousnessdecision makingmental chronometrymotion perceptionreaction time

Identifiers

PMID28756951
PMCPMC5558038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.