Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28756902›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2017

Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240).

Krishnansu S Tewari, Michael W Sill, Richard T Penson, Helen Huang, Lois M Ramondetta, Lisa M Landrum, Ana Oaknin, Thomas J Reid, Mario M Leitao, Helen E Michael and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06832397 (Prospective Observational Study On the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases by Diagnostic LAparoscopy in Specific Subgroups of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical canceR), which is not on this map. Cited by 355 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
355citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
41.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06832397 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Observational Study On the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases by Diagnostic LAparoscopy in Specific Subgroups of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical canceR

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2025 to 2031Enrolled120ConditionsCervical CancerArmsDiagnostic laparoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

355 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 660 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. SEOM-GEICO Clinical Guidelines on cervical cancer (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer - Update 2023.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

295 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

Krishnansu S TewariDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA. Electronic address: ktewari@uci.edu.
Michael W SillRoswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Richard T PensonMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Helen HuangRoswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Lois M RamondettaMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lisa M LandrumDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Ana OakninVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Thomas J ReidUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Women's Cancer Center at Kettering, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Mario M LeitaoMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Helen E MichaelIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Philip J DiSaiaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Larry J CopelandOhio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
William T CreasmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Frederick B StehmanIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mark F BradyRoswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Robert A BurgerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Tate ThigpenUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Michael J BirrerMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven E WaggonerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David H MooreFranciscan St Francis Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Katherine Y LookGenentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Wui-Jin KohDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bradley J MonkArizona Oncology (US Oncology Network), University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine at St Joseph's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Indiana University School of MedicineMassachusetts General Hospital · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · USCase Western Reserve University · USFranciscan Health Indianapolis · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe US Oncology Network · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Washington · USVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA101165 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 2003 to 2014
$43.1M
University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareU10CA180867 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD JOHN, KIBEL, ADAM S · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP)U10CA180858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUNT, KELLY K, PINNIX, CHELSEA CAMILLE · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
Novel biologic markers of treatment resistance in locally advanced cervical carciR21CA156032 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI FRUEHAUF, JOHN P, TEWARI, KRISHNANSU SUJATA · 2011 to 2012
$359k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NCI NIH HHS R21 CA156032NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA101165NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOn Aug 14, 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab for women with advanced cervical cancer on the basis of improved overall survival (OS) after the second interim analysis (in 2012) of 271 deaths in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 240 trial. In this study, we report the prespecified final analysis of the primary objectives, OS and adverse events.

methodsIn this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma from 81 centres in the USA, Canada, and Spain. Inclusion criteria included a GOG performance status score of 0 or 1; adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; adequately anticoagulated thromboembolism; a urine protein to creatinine ratio of less than 1; and measurable disease. Patients who had received chemotherapy for recurrence and those with non-healing wounds or active bleeding conditions were ineligible. We randomly allocated patients 1:1:1:1 (blocking used; block size of four) to intravenous chemotherapy of either cisplatin (50 mg/m

findingsBetween April 6, 2009, and Jan 3, 2012, we enrolled 452 patients (225 [50%] in the two chemotherapy-alone groups and 227 [50%] in the two chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups). By March 7, 2014, 348 deaths had occurred, meeting the prespecified cutoff for final analysis. The chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups continued to show significant improvement in OS compared with the chemotherapy-alone groups: 16·8 months in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups versus 13·3 months in the chemotherapy-alone groups (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·62-0·95]; p=0·007). Final OS among patients not receiving previous pelvic radiotherapy was 24·5 months versus 16·8 months (0·64 [0·37-1·10]; p=0·11). Postprogression OS was not significantly different between the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (8·4 months) and chemotherapy-alone groups (7·1 months; 0·83 [0·66-1·05]; p=0·06). Fistula (any grade) occurred in 32 (15%) of 220 patients in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (all previously irradiated) versus three (1%) of 220 in the chemotherapy-alone groups (all previously irradiated). Grade 3 fistula developed in 13 (6%) versus one (<1%). No fistulas resulted in surgical emergencies, sepsis, or death.

interpretationThe benefit conferred by incorporation of bevacizumab is sustained with extended follow-up as evidenced by the overall survival curves remaining separated. After progression while receiving bevacizumab, we did not observe a negative rebound effect (ie, shorter survival after bevacizumab is stopped than after chemotherapy alone is stopped). These findings represent proof-of-concept of the efficacy and tolerability of antiangiogenesis therapy in advanced cervical cancer.

fundingNational Cancer Institute.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMiddle AgedPaclitaxelTopotecanUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBevacizumabCisplatinPaclitaxelTopotecan

Identifiers

PMID28756902
PMCPMC5714293
OpenAlexW2742133220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.