Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28756569›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

Sudden hearing loss: an effectivity comparison of intratympanic and systemic steroid treatments.

Gülce Ermutlu, Nilda Süslü, Taner Yılmaz, Sarp Saraç

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intratympanic corticosteroids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Observation on the efficacy of Eustachian tube dilation hormone under the guidance of endoscope in the treatment of sudden deafness].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Adverse Effects of Steroid Therapy in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Promising Applications of Nanoparticles in the Treatment of Hearing Loss.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gülce ErmutluDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. gulceermutlu@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-2564
Nilda SüslüDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Taner YılmazDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Sarp SaraçDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Koc University Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Hacettepe University · TRErgani Devlet Hastanesi · TRKoç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corticosteroid treatment has been considered the most effective treatment modality for sudden sensorineural hearing loss so far. Application route of corticosteroids may vary. We have designed a prospective randomized case-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectivenesses of the different application routes of steroids in the treatment of SSHL. Thirty-five patients were distributed randomly to two groups which were treated with either 'oral' or 'intratympanic' corticosteroids. Intratympanic steroid administration was performed three times every other day transtympanically. At the end of third month, recovery rate in the 'intratympanic' group was 84.2%, whereas in the 'oral' group, it was 87.5%. The difference between the recovery rates was not statistically significant. There were no major complications related to transtympanic steroid administration. These findings support that intratympanic steroid therapy is an alternative to systemic steroid therapy in the initial treatment of sudden hearing loss. In addition, transtympanic technique is an easy to perform and safe method for delivering steroids into the inner ear.

Indexed as

Administration, OralGlucocorticoidsHearing Loss, SensorineuralHearing Loss, SuddenAdultAudiometry, Pure-ToneFemaleHumansInjection, IntratympanicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGlucocorticoidsCorticosteroidGlucocorticoidIntratympanicSensorineuralSudden hearing loss

Identifiers

PMID28756569
OpenAlexW2740439595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.