Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28756556›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2018

The Validity of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders Revised (SCARED-R) Scale and Sub-Scales in Swedish Youth.

Tord Ivarsson, Gudmundur Skarphedinsson, Markus Andersson, Håkan Jarbin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating a program to prevent anxiety in children of anxious parents: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Computerized Adaptive Tests for Rapid and Accurate Assessment of Psychopathology Dimensions in Youth.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tord IvarssonThe Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Postboks 4623 Nydalen, 0405, Oslo, Norway. tord.ivarsson@r-bup.no.ORCID 0000-0002-4221-7211
Gudmundur SkarphedinssonThe Faculty of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Markus AnderssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Håkan JarbinDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the clinical utility of the Swedish SCARED-R in child- and adolescent psychiatric outpatients (n = 239) and validated it against Longitudinal Expert All Data (LEAD) DSM IV diagnoses based on the Children's Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS) and subsequent clinical work-up and treatment outcome. The SCARED-R total score and subscales had acceptable sensitivity/specificity for child and parent reports for cut-offs based on Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves, with mostly moderate area under the curve. Sensitivity ranged from 75% (parent rated social anxiety) to 79% [child rated Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)]. Specificity, ranged from 60% for child-rated GAD to 88% for parent rated social anxiety. Parent-child agreement was moderate, and each informant provided unique information contributing to most diagnoses. In conclusion, the SCARED-R is useful for screening anxiety symptoms in clinical populations. However, it cannot replace interview based diagnoses, nor is it adequate to use just one informant.

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdolescentAnxiety DisordersChildEmotionsFearFemaleHumansMaleMood DisordersPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySwedenTreatment OutcomeAnxiety disorderConcurrent validityDiscriminant validityLEAD diagnosisParent rating scaleSelf-rating scale

Identifiers

PMID28756556
PMCPMC5856859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.