Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28756509›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2017

Glenohumeral and scapulohumeral kinematic analysis of patients with traumatic anterior instability wearing a shoulder brace: a prospective laboratory study.

F Dellabiancia, I Parel, M V Filippi, G Porcellini, G Merolla

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optical Motion Capture Systems for 3D Kinematic Analysis in Patients with Shoulder Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F Dellabiancia"Marco Simoncelli" Biomechanics Laboratory, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Cattolica, Italy.
I Parel"Marco Simoncelli" Biomechanics Laboratory, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Cattolica, Italy.
M V FilippiFunctional Recovery and Rehabilitation Service, AUSL della Romagna Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Rimini, Italy.
G PorcelliniShoulder and Elbow Surgery Unit, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, L.V. Beethoven 5, 47841, Cattolica, Italy.
G Merolla"Marco Simoncelli" Biomechanics Laboratory, "D. Cervesi" Hospital, AUSL della Romagna Ambito Territoriale di Rimini, Cattolica, Italy. giovannimerolla@hotmail.com.
Ospedale Cervesi di Cattolica · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Rimini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effectiveness of a novel glenohumeral joint immobilizer, the S2 Shoulder Stabilizer

methodsParticipants in this prospective laboratory study were recruited from patients with anterior traumatic instability awaiting arthroscopic glenohumeral stabilization. Glenohumeral and scapulohumeral kinematic data (arm abduction-adduction and internal-external rotation, and scapular pronation-retraction and mediolateral rotation) were collected twice, without and with the brace, using a VICON™ motion capture system, and processed with MATLAB

resultsThe tests showed a significantly lower joint angle during abduction-adduction (p = 0.0022) and external rotation (p = 0.0076) and a significantly lower (p = 0.0022) mediolateral scapular rotation angle in the limbs wearing the immobilizer. Humeral head translation during abduction-adduction and internal-external rotation was also lower in the patients wearing the brace.

conclusionsThe immobilizer significantly limited joint excursion in all planes of movement except internal rotation. The narrower humeral head translation with respect to the trunk, measured in the tests with the brace, demonstrates that the immobilizer achieves the goal of preserving joint stability in the movements that are at risk of dislocation.

Indexed as

BracesAdolescentAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansImmobilizationJoint InstabilityMalePhotogrammetryProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularScapulaShoulder DislocationShoulder JointAnterior instabilityGlenohumeral jointKinematicOrthosisShoulder

Identifiers

PMID28756509
OpenAlexW2739654934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.