Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28756480›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2018

Validation of the Readiness for Return-To-Work Scale in Outpatient Occupational Rehabilitation in Canada.

Joanne Park, Mary Roduta Roberts, Shaniff Esmail, Fahreen Rayani, Colleen M Norris, Douglas P Gross

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanne ParkDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, 3-48 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, Canada. jypark@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5428-1133
Mary Roduta RobertsDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, 3-48 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, Canada.
Shaniff EsmailDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, 3-48 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, Canada.
Fahreen RayaniWorkers' Compensation Board of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Colleen M NorrisFaculty of Nursing/Public Health, School of/Medicine & Dentistry Medicine/Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Douglas P GrossDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To examine construct and concurrent validity of the Readiness for Return-To-Work (RRTW) Scale with injured workers participating in an outpatient occupational rehabilitation program. Methods Lost-time claimants (n = 389) with sub-acute or chronic musculoskeletal disorders completed the RRTW Scale on their first day of their occupational rehabilitation program. Statistical analysis included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the readiness items, reliability analyses, and correlation with related scales and questionnaires. Results For claimants in the non-job attached/not working group (n = 165), three factors were found (1) Contemplation (2) Prepared for Action-Self-evaluative and (3) Prepared for Action-Behavioural. The precontemplation stage was not identified within this sample of injured workers. For claimants who were job attached/working group in some capacity (n = 224), two factors were identified (1) Uncertain Maintenance and (2) Proactive Maintenance. Expected relationships and statistically significant differences were found among the identified Return-To-Work (RTW) readiness factors and related constructs of pain, physical and mental health and RTW expectations. Conclusion Construct and concurrent validity of the RRTW Scale were supported in this study. The results of this study indicate the construct of readiness for RTW can vary by disability duration and occupational category. Physical health appears to be a significant barrier to RRTW for the job attached/working group while mental health significantly compromises RRTW with the non-job attached/not working group.

Indexed as

Work Capacity EvaluationAdultAlbertaAnalysis of VarianceCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational InjuriesReturn to WorkVisual Analog ScaleMeasurementMusculoskeletalReadiness for changeReturn-To-WorkWork disabilityWorkers’ compensation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.