ArticlePatient education and counseling2018
Intensive referral to mutual-help groups: A field trial of adaptations for rural veterans.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Warm Handoffs for Improving Client Receipt of Services: A Systematic Review.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Pooled it
- Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Al-Anon Intensive Referral to facilitate concerned others' participation in Al-Anon Family Groups: a randomized controlled trial.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2022Trial
- Al-Anon Intensive Referral (AIR): A qualitative formative evaluation for implementation.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2022Trial
- Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-Step Facilitation Treatments for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Distillation of a 2020 Cochrane Review for Clinicians and Policy Makers.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2020Review
- Intensive Referral of Veterans to Mutual-Help Groups: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Evaluation.Alcoholism treatment quarterly · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA multisite field trial testing whether improved outcomes associated with intensive referral to mutual help groups (MHGs) could be maintained after the intervention was adapted for the circumstances and needs of rural veterans in treatment for substance use disorder (SUD).
methodsIn three Veterans Affairs treatment programs in the Midwest, patients (N=195) received standard referral (SR) or rural-adapted intensive referral (RAIR) and were measured at baseline and 6-month follow-up.
resultsBoth groups reported significant improvement at 6-months, but no significant differences between SR and RAIR groups in MHG participation, substance use, addiction severity, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Inconsistent delivery of the intervention resulted in only one-third of the RAIR group receiving the full three sessions, but this group reported significantly greater 6-month abstinence from alcohol than those receiving no sessions.
conclusionFurther research should explore implementation problems and determine whether consistent delivery of the intervention enhances 12-step facilitation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The addition of rural-specific elements to the original intensive referral intervention has not been shown to increase its effectiveness among rural veterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.