Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28755382›Full record

ReviewImmunology2017

Tools to define the melanoma-associated immunopeptidome.

Eva Bräunlein, Angela M Krackhardt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. An Immunological Glance on Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eva BräunleinMedizinische Klinik III, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Angela M KrackhardtMedizinische Klinik III, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4752-0543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapies have been traditionally applied in malignant melanoma, which represent one of the most immunogenic tumours. Recently, immune checkpoint modulation has shown high therapeutic efficacy and may provide long-term survival in a significant proportion of affected patients. T cells are the major players in tumour rejection and recognize tumour cells predominantly in an MHC-dependent way. The immunopeptidome comprises the peptide repertoire presented by MHC class I and II molecules on the surface of the body's cells including tumour cells. To understand characteristics of suitable rejection antigens as well as respective effective T-cell responses, determination of the immunopeptidome is of utmost importance. Suitable rejection antigens need to be further characterized and validated not only to systematically improve current therapeutic approaches, but also to develop individualized treatment options. In this review, we report on current tools to explore the immunopeptidome in human melanoma and discuss current understanding and future developments to specifically detect and select those antigens that may be most relevant and promising for effective tumour rejection.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmMelanomaNeoplasm ProteinsPeptidesAnimalsHumansImmunotherapyProteomicsAntigens, NeoplasmNeoplasm ProteinsPeptidesimmunogenicityimmunopeptidomemelanomaT cellstumor antigenstumor rejection

Identifiers

PMID28755382
PMCPMC5680071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.