Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28755309›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2017

Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Asymmetric Waveforms and Development of a Single-Point Measure.

Robert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, Jaime Undurraga, Olivier Macherey, Astrid van Wieringen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the Use of Interleaved Stimuli to Measure Cochlear-Implant Excitation Patterns.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Article
  4. Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  5. Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert P CarlyonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge, CB1 3DA, UK.
John M DeeksMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge, CB1 3DA, UK. john.deeks@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Jaime UndurragaExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KULeuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Olivier MachereyMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge, CB1 3DA, UK.
Astrid van WieringenExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KULeuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105559842Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three experiments studied the extent to which cochlear implant users' spatial selectivity can be manipulated using asymmetric waveforms and tested an efficient method for comparing spatial selectivity produced by different stimuli. Experiment 1 measured forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) for a partial tripolar (pTP) probe. Maskers were presented on bipolar pairs separated by one unused electrode; waveforms were either symmetric biphasic ("SYM") or pseudomonophasic with the short high-amplitude phase being either anodic ("PSA") or cathodic ("PSC") on the more apical electrode. For the SYM masker, several subjects showed PTCs consistent with a bimodal excitation pattern, with discrete excitation peaks on each electrode of the bipolar masker pair. Most subjects showed significant differences between the PSA and PSC maskers consistent with greater masking by the electrode where the high-amplitude phase was anodic, but the pattern differed markedly across subjects. Experiment 2 measured masked excitation patterns for a pTP probe and either a monopolar symmetric biphasic masker ("MP_SYM") or pTP pseudomonophasic maskers where the short high-amplitude phase was either anodic ("TP_PSA") or cathodic ("TP_PSC") on the masker's central electrode. Four of the five subjects showed significant differences between the masker types, but again the pattern varied markedly across subjects. Because the levels of the maskers were chosen to produce the same masking of a probe on the same channel as the masker, it was correctly predicted that maskers that produce broader masking patterns would sound louder. Experiment 3 exploited this finding by using a single-point measure of spread of excitation to reveal significantly better spatial selectivity for TP_PSA compared to TP_PSC maskers.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAgedHumansLoudness PerceptionMiddle AgedSpeech Acousticscochlear implantsspatial selectivity

Identifiers

PMID28755309
PMCPMC5612920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.