Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28755306›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2017

Keratoconus Treatment Algorithm.

Konstantinos D Andreanos, Kate Hashemi, Myrsini Petrelli, Konstantinos Droutsas, Ilias Georgalas, George D Kymionis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Konstantinos D Andreanos1st Department of Ophthalmology, 'G. Gennimatas Hospital', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. coandre80@icloud.com.
Kate HashemiFaculty of Biology and Medicine, Jules Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Myrsini Petrelli1st Department of Ophthalmology, 'G. Gennimatas Hospital', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos Droutsas1st Department of Ophthalmology, 'G. Gennimatas Hospital', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ilias Georgalas1st Department of Ophthalmology, 'G. Gennimatas Hospital', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
George D Kymionis1st Department of Ophthalmology, 'G. Gennimatas Hospital', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratoconus management has significantly changed over the last two decades. The advent of new interventions such as cornea cross-linking, intrastromal corneal ring segments, and combined treatments provide corneal clinicians a variety of treatment options for the visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients. This review summarizes current evidence for these treatments and highlights their place in keratoconus management while new promising emerging therapies are being investigated.

Indexed as

Accelerated cross-linkingCorneal cross-linkingCXL plusEpi-on cross-linkingIntrastromal corneal ring segmentsKeratoconus treatment algorithm

Identifiers

PMID28755306
PMCPMC5693837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.