ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2017
Provider Experiences with Chronic Care Management (CCM) Services and Fees: A Qualitative Research Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimorbidity and consultation time: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Person-Centered Care Planning for People With Multiple Chronic Conditions: An Environmental Scan of Models and Approaches.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Factors associated with high vs. low implementation of Medicare's chronic care management programme in Wyoming primary care practices.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- Lifestyle Medicine for Obesity in the Era of Highly Effective Anti-Obesity Treatment.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Care management services at safety-net clinics in the United States.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Use of chronic care management service among Medicare beneficiaries in 2015-2019.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Team-based home blood pressure monitoring for blood pressure equity a protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
- Clarifying the muddy concept of home healthcare coordination: A comprehensive theoretical framework.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Primary Care Urgently Needs Support for Interprofessional Teams.The Permanente journal · 2022Article
- Cost of providing co-located hepatitis C treatment at a syringe service program exceeds potential reimbursement: Results from a clinical trial.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2022Article
- Key stakeholder experiences of an integrated healthcare pilot in Australia: a thematic analysis.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Use of Chronic Care Management Among Primary Care Clinicians.Annals of family medicine · 2020Article
- Sustaining the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM): Billing Newly Available CoCM CPT Codes in an Academic Primary Care System.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2020Article
- Medicare's Care Management Codes Might Not Support Primary Care As Expected.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2020Article
- A Platform and Clinical Model to Enable Medicare's Chronic Care Management Program.Population health management · 2020Article
- Efficient goal attainment and engagement in a care manager system using unstructured notes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Early Health System Experiences with Collaborative Care (CoCM) Billing Codes: a Qualitative Study of Leadership and Support Staff.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Sustainable care coordination: a qualitative study of primary care provider, administrator, and insurer perspectives.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Patient Experiences with Chronic Care Management Services and Fees: a Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
- Use of Chronic Care Management Codes for Medicare Beneficiaries: a Missed Opportunity?Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupport for ongoing care management and coordination between office visits for patients with multiple chronic conditions has been inadequate. In January 2015, Medicare introduced the Chronic Care Management (CCM) payment policy, which reimburses providers for CCM activities for Medicare beneficiaries occurring outside of office visits.
objectiveTo explore the experiences, facilitators, and challenges of practices providing CCM services, and their implications going forward.
designSemi-structured telephone interviews from January to April 2016 with 71 respondents.
participantsSixty billing and non-billing providers and practice staff knowledgeable about their practices' CCM services, and 11 professional society representatives. KEY
resultsPractice respondents noted that most patients expressed positive views of CCM services. Practice respondents also perceived several patient benefits, including improved adherence to treatment, access to care team members, satisfaction, care continuity, and care coordination. Facilitators of CCM provision included having an in-practice care manager, patient-centered medical home recognition, experience developing care plans, patient trust in their provider, and supplemental insurance to cover CCM copayments. Most billing practices reported few problems obtaining patients' consent for CCM, though providers felt that CMS could better facilitate consent by marketing CCM's goals to beneficiaries. Barriers reported by professional society representatives and by billing and non-billing providers included inadequacy of CCM payments to cover upfront investments for staffing, workflow modification, and time needed to manage complex patients. Other barriers included inadequate infrastructure for health information exchange with other providers and limited electronic health record capabilities for documenting and updating care plans. Practices owned by hospital systems and large medical groups faced greater bureaucracy in implementing CCM than did smaller, independent practices.
conclusionsImproving providers' experiences with and uptake of CCM will require addressing several challenges, including the upfront investment for CCM set-up and the time required to provide CCM to more complex patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.