Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28754921›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Evaluation of two lead malaria transmission blocking vaccine candidate antibodies in natural parasite-vector combinations.

Anais Bompard, Dari F Da, Rakiswendé S Yerbanga, Sumi Biswas, Melissa Kapulu, Teun Bousema, Thierry Lefèvre, Anna Cohuet, Thomas S Churcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Immunogenicity and transmission-blocking potential of quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Multi-StageFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anais BompardMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom. anais.bompard@gmail.com.
Dari F DaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Rakiswendé S YerbangaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0001-8345-0880
Sumi BiswasThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Melissa KapuluThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Teun BousemaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thierry LefèvreInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Anna CohuetUnité MIVEGEC, IRD 224-CNRS 5290-Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-5656
Thomas S ChurcherMRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8442-0525

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transmission blocking vaccines (TBV) which aim to control malaria by inhibiting human-to-mosquito transmission show considerable promise though their utility against naturally circulating parasites remains unknown. The efficacy of two lead candidates targeting Pfs25 and Pfs230 antigens to prevent onwards transmission of naturally occurring parasites to a local mosquito strain is assessed using direct membrane feeding assays and murine antibodies in Burkina Faso. The transmission blocking activity of both candidates depends on the level of parasite exposure (as assessed by the mean number of oocysts in control mosquitoes) and antibody titers. A mathematical framework is devised to allow the efficacy of different candidates to be directly compared and determine the minimal antibody titers required to halt transmission in different settings. The increased efficacy with diminishing parasite exposure indicates that the efficacy of vaccines targeting either Pfs25 or Pfs230 may increase as malaria transmission declines. This has important implications for late-stage candidate selection and assessing how they can support the drive for malaria elimination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesAntibodies, BlockingImmunoglobulin GMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMosquito VectorsOocystsParasitesPlasmodium falciparumAntibodies, BlockingImmunoglobulin GMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID28754921
PMCPMC5533793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.