ReviewThe oncologist2017
Fixed Dosing of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology.
Review in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reporting on patient's body mass index (BMI) in recent clinical trials for patients with breast cancer: a systematic review.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Pooled it
- Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis of durvalumab in patients with resectable stage II to IIIB (N2) NSCLC in the phase III AEGEAN study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Elranatamab Fixed Dosing: A Safe, Effective, and Convenient Dosing Approach.Targeted oncology · 2025Trial
- First-in-Human Study of 23ME-00610, an Antagonistic Antibody for Genetically Validated CD200R1 Immune Checkpoint, in Participants with Advanced Solid Malignancies.Cancer research communications · 2025Trial
- Phase II Trial of HER-Vaxx, a B-cell Peptide-Based Vaccine, in HER2-Overexpressing Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Under Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (HERIZON).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SM17 in healthy volunteers: results from pre-clinical models and a first-in-human, randomized, double blinded clinical trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Trial
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of ravulizumab and eculizumab on complement component 5 in adults with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria: results of two phase 3 randomised, multicentre studies.British journal of haematology · 2020Trial
- Population Pharmacokinetics of MCLA-128, a HER2/HER3 Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Solid Tumors.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2020Trial
- Mepolizumab reduces exacerbations in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, irrespective of body weight/body mass index: meta-analysis of MENSA and MUSCA.Respiratory research · 2019Trial
- Dosing challenges for chemotherapy and immunotherapy in congenital achondroplasia: a case report and literature review.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
- Advancing Wider Implementation of Multi-regional Clinical Trials in East Asia.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Antibody-bottlebrush prodrug conjugates for targeted cancer therapy.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Real-world obesity prevalence and history in 79 271 patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy across 13 cancer types in England (2013-2023).ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Cost implications of early treatment discontinuation in cancer: a real-world data analysis.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Assessment of an 800 µg Dose of HEBERSaVax in Non-Human Primates over Six Months.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Individualized dosing in the precision medicine era: a narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Eco Friendly and Budget Smart: An Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Alternative PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitor Dosing Regimens.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Weight-Based Pembrolizumab Dosing at 4 mg/kg Every 6 Weeks Leads to Exposures Below Approved Doses with Unestablished Efficacy: A Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Simulation Analysis.Targeted oncology · 2025Article
- Host Cell Protein Clinical Safety Risk Assessment-An Updated Industry Review.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Review
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most monoclonal antibodies in oncology are administered in body-size-based dosing schedules. This is believed to correct for variability in both drug distribution and elimination between patients. However, monoclonal antibodies typically distribute to the blood plasma and extracellular fluids only, which increase less than proportionally with the increase in body weight. Elimination takes place via proteolytic catabolism, a nonspecific immunoglobulin G elimination pathway, and intracellular degradation after binding to the target. The latter is the primary route of elimination and is related to target expression levels rather than body size. Taken together, the minor effects of body size on distribution and elimination of monoclonal antibodies and their usually wide therapeutic window do not support body-size-based dosing. We evaluated effects of body weight on volume of distribution and clearance of monoclonal antibodies in oncology and show that a fixed dose for most of these drugs is justified based on pharmacokinetics. A survey of the savings after fixed dosing of monoclonal antibodies at our hospital showed that fixed dosing can reduce costs of health care, especially when pooling of preparations is not possible (which is often the case in smaller hospitals). In conclusion, based on pharmacokinetic parameters of monoclonal antibodies, there is a rationale for fixed dosing of these drugs in oncology. Therefore, we believe that fixed dosing is justified and can improve efficiency of the compounding. Moreover, drug spillage can be reduced and medication errors may become less likely. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The currently available knowledge of elimination of monoclonal antibodies combined with the publicly available data from clinical trials and extensive population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling justifies fixed dosing. Interpatient variation in exposure is comparable after body weight and fixed dosing and most monoclonal antibodies show relatively flat dose-response relationships. For monoclonal antibodies, this results in wide therapeutic windows and no reduced clinical efficacy after fixed dosing. Therefore, we believe that fixed dosing at a well-selected dose can increase medication safety and help in reduction of costs of health care without the loss of efficacy or safety margins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.