Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28754720›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

Li Liu, Cheng Liu, Omid Fotouhi, Yidong Fan, Kun Wang, Chuanyou Xia, Benkang Shi, Guangyong Zhang, Kexin Wang, Feng Kong and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Telomere-related Markers for Cancer.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Li LiuDepartments of General Surgery, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Cheng LiuUrology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Omid FotouhiDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, and Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yidong FanUrology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Kun WangDepartment of Urology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Chuanyou XiaUrology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Benkang ShiUrology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Guangyong ZhangDepartments of General Surgery, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Kexin WangDepartments of General Surgery, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Feng KongCentral Research Laboratory, Shandong University Second Hospital, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Catharina LarssonDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, and Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sanyuan HuDepartments of General Surgery, Jinan, People's Republic of China husanyuan1962@hotmail.com Dawei.Xu@ki.se.
Dawei XuShandong University-Karolinska Institutet Collaborative Laboratory for Cancer Research, Jinan, People's Republic of China husanyuan1962@hotmail.com Dawei.Xu@ki.se.
Fourth People’s Hospital of Jinan · CNKarolinska Institutet · SEQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNSecond Hospital of Shandong University · CNShandong University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a high demand for noninvasive screening tools for gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) detection, and GIC-specific markers are required for such purposes. It is established that induction of the telomerase reverse transcriptase gene ( MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-nine GIC patients (34 colorectal carcinoma and 35 gastric cancer) and 62 healthy adults were recruited and fecal samples were collected. Paired tumors and adjacent non-cancerous tissues from 34 patients and normal mucosa tissues from 12 healthy individuals were collected.

resultsWe identified two GIC-specific methylation sites at -218 (CpG site 1) and -210 (CpG site 2) in the

conclusionThis proof-of-concept study suggests the feasibility of stool IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Induction of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) expression coupled with telomerase activation is essential for cancer development/progression, while aberrant TERT promoter methylation has been linked to TERT induction in oncogenesis. We identified two cancer-specific methylation sites (CpG1 and 2) in the TERT promoter in tumors from GIC patients. Methylated TERT promoter CpG sites 1 and 2 were detectable in patient stool, while only background levels were observed in healthy individuals. The sensitivity and specificity was comparable to other known stool methylation markers for GIC detection. This proof-of-concept study suggests the feasibility of stool TERT promoter methylation analyses for noninvasive screening of GIC.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAmino Acid SequenceBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPromoter Regions, GeneticStomach NeoplasmsTelomeraseBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmTelomeraseTERT protein, humanCancer biomarkersGastrointestinal cancerNoninvasive assayPromoter methylationTelomerase reverse transcriptase

Identifiers

PMID28754720
PMCPMC5634768
OpenAlexW2739636904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.