Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28754653›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Integrated Care in Prostate Cancer (ICARE-P): Nonrandomized Controlled Feasibility Study of Online Holistic Needs Assessment, Linking the Patient and the Health Care Team.

Veronica Nanton, Rebecca Appleton, Jeremy Dale, Julia Roscoe, Thomas Hamborg, Sam H Ahmedzai, Theodoros N Arvanitis, Douglas Badger, Nicholas James, Richard Mendelsohn and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Exploring the experiences of patients, general practitioners and oncologists of prostate cancer follow-up: A qualitative interview study.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2020
    Article
  4. Promoting integrated care in prostate cancer through online prostate cancer-specific holistic needs assessment: a feasibility study in primary care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Veronica NantonDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-822X
Rebecca AppletonDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4097-3512
Jeremy DaleDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9256-3553
Julia RoscoeDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-3385
Thomas HamborgDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7154-3983
Sam H AhmedzaiMedical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-8510
Theodoros N ArvanitisInstitute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5473-135X
Douglas BadgerSouth Warwickshire Prostate Support Association, Stratford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8265-1250
Nicholas JamesThe Cancer Centre, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7314-8204
Richard MendelsohnBirmingham South Central CCG, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4729-9647
Omar KhanInstitute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6851-3804
Deepak ParasharDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-3663
Prashant PatelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2882-5990
University of Warwick · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0214-33092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential of technology to aid integration of care delivery systems is being explored in a range of contexts across a variety of conditions in the United Kingdom. Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in UK men. With a 10-year survival rate of 84%, there is a need to explore innovative methods of care that are integrated between primary health care providers and specialist teams in order to address long-term consequences of the disease and its treatment as well as to provide continued monitoring for recurrence.

objectiveOur aim was to test the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to compare a model of prostate cancer continuing and follow-up care integration, underpinned by digital technology, with usual care in terms of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes, and experience.

methodsA first phase of the study has included development of an online adaptive prostate specific Holistic Needs Assessment system (HNA), training for primary care-based nurses, training of an IT peer supporter, and interviews with health care professionals and men with prostate cancer to explore views of their care, experience of technology, and views of the proposed intervention. In Phase 2, men in the intervention arm will complete the HNA at home to help identify and articulate concerns and share them with their health care professionals, in both primary and specialist care. Participants in the control arm will receive usual care. Outcomes including quality of life and well-being, prostate-specific concerns, and patient enablement will be measured 3 times over a 9-month period.

resultsFindings from phase 1 indicated strong support for the intervention among men, including those who had had little experience of digital technology. Men expressed a range of views on ways that the online system might be used within a clinical pathway. Health care professionals gave valuable feedback on how the output of the assessment might be presented to encourage engagement and uptake by clinical teams. Recruitment to the second phase of the study, the feasibility trial, commenced March 2017.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this study is the first in the United Kingdom to trial an online holistic needs assessment for men with prostate cancer, with data shared between patients and primary and secondary care providers. This study addresses recommendations in recent policy documents promoting the importance of data sharing and enhanced communication between care providers as a basis for care integration. We anticipate that this model of care will ultimately provide important benefits for both patients and the National Health Service.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 31380482; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN31380482 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6s8I42u5N).

Indexed as

holistic needs assessmentintegrated careInternetprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28754653
PMCPMC5554351
OpenAlexW2740524123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.