Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28754648›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2017

Microtopographical cues promote peripheral nerve regeneration via transient mTORC2 activation.

Suzanne E Thomson, Chloe Charalambous, Carol-Anne Smith, Penelope M Tsimbouri, Theophile Déjardin, Paul J Kingham, Andrew M Hart, Mathis O Riehle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Dual-layer microneedles with NO/OBioactive materials · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Local problems need global solutions: The metabolic needs of regenerating organisms.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suzanne E ThomsonThe Centre for Cell Engineering, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Hillhead, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK. Electronic address: suzanne.thomson@doctors.org.uk.
Chloe CharalambousThe Centre for Cell Engineering, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Hillhead, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Carol-Anne SmithThe Centre for Cell Engineering, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Hillhead, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Penelope M TsimbouriThe Centre for Cell Engineering, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Hillhead, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Theophile DéjardinThe Centre for Cell Engineering, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Hillhead, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; Institut Jacques Monod CNRS UMR 7592, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Paul J KinghamDept. of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Andrew M HartThe Centre for Cell Engineering, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Hillhead, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK; Dept. of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Mathis O RiehleThe Centre for Cell Engineering, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Hillhead, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L017741/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite microsurgical repair, recovery of function following peripheral nerve injury is slow and often incomplete. Outcomes could be improved by an increased understanding of the molecular biology of regeneration and by translation of experimental bioengineering strategies. Topographical cues have been shown to be powerful regulators of the rate and directionality of neurite regeneration, and in this study we investigated the downstream molecular effects of linear micropatterned structures in an organotypic explant model. Linear topographical cues enhanced neurite outgrowth and our results demonstrated that the mTOR pathway is important in regulating these responses. mTOR gene expression peaked between 48 and 72h, coincident with the onset of rapid neurite outgrowth and glial migration, and correlated with neurite length at 48h. mTOR protein was located to glia and in a punctate distribution along neurites. mTOR levels peaked at 72h and were significantly increased by patterned topography (p<0.05). Furthermore, the topographical cues could override pharmacological inhibition. Downstream phosphorylation assays and inhibition of mTORC1 using rapamycin highlighted mTORC2 as an important mediator, and more specific therapeutic target. Quantitative immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of the mTORC2 component rictor at the regenerating front where it co-localised with F-actin and vinculin. Collectively, these results provide a deeper understanding of the mechanism of action of topography on neural regeneration, and support the incorporation of topographical patterning in combination with pharmacological mTORC2 potentiation within biomaterial constructs used to repair peripheral nerves. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Peripheral nerve injury is common and functionally devastating. Despite microsurgical repair, healing is slow and incomplete, with lasting functional deficit. There is a clear need to translate bioengineering approaches and increase our knowledge of the molecular processes controlling nerve regeneration to improve the rate and success of healing. Topographical cues are powerful determinants of neurite outgrowth and represent a highly translatable engineering strategy. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, that microtopography potentiates neurite outgrowth via the mTOR pathway, with the mTORC2 subtype being of particular importance. These results give further evidence for the incorporation of microtopographical cues into peripheral nerve regeneration conduits and indicate that mTORC2 may be a suitable therapeutic target to potentiate nerve regeneration.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationNerve RegenerationAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2Peripheral Nerve InjuriesPeripheral NervesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2mTOR protein, ratTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesMicrotopographymTORPeripheral nerveTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID28754648
PMCPMC5593812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.