Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28754157›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2017

Why did you choose psychiatry? a qualitative study of psychiatry trainees investigating the impact of psychiatry teaching at medical school on career choice.

A Appleton, S Singh, N Eady, M Buszewicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A AppletonResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
S SinghResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
N EadyEast London NHS Foundation Trust, 9 Alie Street, London, E1 8DE, UK.
M BuszewiczResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK. m.buszewicz@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4016-5857
University College London · GBDepartment of Health and Social Care · GBEast London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus regarding the optimal content of the undergraduate psychiatry curriculum as well as factors contributing to young doctors choosing a career in psychiatry. Our aim was to explore factors which had influenced psychiatry trainees' attitudes towards mental health and career choice.

methodQualitative in-depth interviews with 21 purposively sampled London psychiatry trainees analysed using the Framework method.

resultsEarly exposure and sufficient time in undergraduate psychiatry placements were important in influencing psychiatry as a career choice and positive role models were often very influential. Integration of psychiatry with teaching about physical health was viewed positively, although concerns were raised about the potential dilution of psychiatry teaching. Foundation posts in psychiatry were very valuable in positively impacting career choice. Other suggestions included raising awareness at secondary school level, challenging negative attitudes amongst all medical educators, and promoting integration within medical specialties.

conclusionsImprovements in teaching psychiatry could improve medical attitudes and promote recruitment into psychiatry.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceCurriculumFemaleHumansLondonMalePsychiatryQualitative ResearchSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCareers in psychiatryEducation and trainingQualitative researchStigma and discrimination

Identifiers

PMID28754157
PMCPMC5534074
OpenAlexW2741669048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.