ArticleEuropean urology focus2017
Integrated Biosensor Assay for Rapid Uropathogen Identification and Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.
Article in European urology focus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated iPRISM Direct-on-Urine Platform for Rapid UTI Diagnosis in a Double-Blind Clinical Trial.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- The Current Landscape of Antibiotic Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Japan: Focusing on Common Infections Including Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection and Gonorrhea.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Overcoming challenges in the management of recurrent urinary tract infections.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2024Review
- Next-generation rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Nature communications · 2024Review
- Microfluidic technologies for advanced antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- Current and Future Technologies for the Detection of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Colorimetric Tests for the Detection of Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Single-cell pathogen diagnostics for combating antibiotic resistance.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023Article
- A simple label-free method reveals bacterial growth dynamics and antibiotic action in real-time.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Applying Diagnostic Stewardship to Proactively Optimize the Management of Urinary Tract Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Combating Antimicrobial Resistance via Single-Cell Diagnostic Technologies Powered by Droplet Microfluidics.Accounts of chemical research · 2022Article
- Droplet-Based Single-Cell Measurements of 16S rRNA Enable Integrated Bacteria Identification and Pheno-Molecular Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Clinical Samples in 30 min.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Article
- Article
- Rapid Electrochemical-Based PCR-Less Microbial Quantification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling Directly From Blood and Urine With Unknown Microbial Load or Species.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Article
- Clinical impact of rapid susceptibility testing on Mueller-Hinton Rapid-SIR directly from urine specimens.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020Article
- Beyond Sensitive and Selective Electrochemical Biosensors: Towards Continuous, Real-Time, Antibiofouling and Calibration-Free Devices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Nanoarray Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction with High-Resolution Melt for Enabling Broad Bacteria Identification and Pheno-Molecular Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Nanotube assisted microwave electroporation for single cell pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2019Article
- Optimizing peptide nucleic acid probes for hybridization-based detection and identification of bacterial pathogens.The Analyst · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStandard diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) via urine culture for pathogen identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) takes 2-3 d. This delay results in empiric treatment and contributes to the misuse of antibiotics and the rise of resistant pathogens. A rapid diagnostic test for UTI may improve patient care and antibiotic stewardship.
objectiveTo develop and validate an integrated biosensor assay for UTI diagnosis, including pathogen ID and AST, with determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for ciprofloxacin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsUrine samples positive for Enterobacteriaceae (n=84) or culture-negative (n=23) were obtained from the Stanford Clinical Microbiology Laboratory between November 2013 and September 2014. Each sample was diluted and cultured for 5h with and without ciprofloxacin, followed by quantitative detection of bacterial 16S rRNA using a single electrochemical biosensor array functionalized with a panel of complementary DNA probes. Pathogen ID was determined using universal bacterial, Enterobacteriaceae (EB), and pathogen-specific probes. Phenotypic AST with ciprofloxacin MIC was determined using an EB probe to measure 16S rRNA levels as a function of bacterial growth. MEASUREMENTS: Electrochemical signals for pathogen ID at 6 SD over background were considered positive. An MIC signal of 0.4 log units lower than the no-antibiotic control indicated sensitivity. Results were compared to clinical microbiology reports. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: For pathogen ID, the assay had 98.5% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity, 93.0% positive predictive value, and 99.3% negative predictive value. For ciprofloxacin MIC the categorical and essential agreement was 97.6%. Further automation, testing of additional pathogens and antibiotics, and a full prospective study will be necessary for translation to clinical use.
conclusionsThe integrated biosensor platform achieved microbiological results including MIC comparable to standard culture in a significantly shorter assay time. Further assay automation will allow clinical translation for rapid molecular diagnosis of UTI. PATIENT SUMMARY: We have developed and validated a biosensor test for rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infections. Clinical translation of this device has the potential to significantly expedite and improve treatment of urinary tract infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.