Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28753601›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

A hierarchical Bayesian model for understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of the intestinal epithelium.

Oliver J Maclaren, Aimée Parker, Carmen Pin, Simon R Carding, Alastair J M Watson, Alexander G Fletcher, Helen M Byrne, Philip K Maini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oliver J MaclarenDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-4539
Aimée ParkerGut Health and Food Safety Research Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Carmen PinGut Health and Food Safety Research Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Simon R CardingGut Health and Food Safety Research Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Alastair J M WatsonGut Health and Food Safety Research Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Alexander G FletcherSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-4336
Helen M ByrneWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Philip K MainiWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0146-9164

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004529/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our work addresses two key challenges, one biological and one methodological. First, we aim to understand how proliferation and cell migration rates in the intestinal epithelium are related under healthy, damaged (Ara-C treated) and recovering conditions, and how these relations can be used to identify mechanisms of repair and regeneration. We analyse new data, presented in more detail in a companion paper, in which BrdU/IdU cell-labelling experiments were performed under these respective conditions. Second, in considering how to more rigorously process these data and interpret them using mathematical models, we use a probabilistic, hierarchical approach. This provides a best-practice approach for systematically modelling and understanding the uncertainties that can otherwise undermine the generation of reliable conclusions-uncertainties in experimental measurement and treatment, difficult-to-compare mathematical models of underlying mechanisms, and unknown or unobserved parameters. Both spatially discrete and continuous mechanistic models are considered and related via hierarchical conditional probability assumptions. We perform model checks on both in-sample and out-of-sample datasets and use them to show how to test possible model improvements and assess the robustness of our conclusions. We conclude, for the present set of experiments, that a primarily proliferation-driven model suffices to predict labelled cell dynamics over most time-scales.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, StatisticalAnimalsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyIntestinal MucosaMice

Identifiers

PMID28753601
PMCPMC5550005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.