ArticleNeurobiology of aging2017
Age-related changes in envelope-following responses at equalized peripheral or central activation.
Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consequences and Mechanisms of Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss, With Focuses on Signal Perception in Noise and Temporal Processing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Neurometric amplitude modulation detection in the inferior colliculus of Young and Aged rats.Hearing research · 2024Article
- Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Acoustic deprivation modulates central gain in human auditory brainstem and cortex.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Cortical-brainstem interplay during speech perception in older adults with and without hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- The Relative and Combined Effects of Noise Exposure and Aging on Auditory Peripheral Neural Deafferentation: A Narrative Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- Longitudinal auditory pathophysiology following mild blast-induced trauma.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Age-related central gain compensation for reduced auditory nerve output for people with normal audiograms, with and without tinnitus.iScience · 2021Article
- Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.Hearing research · 2020Review
- Temporal Coding of Single Auditory Nerve Fibers Is Not Degraded in Aging Gerbils.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Investigating the Effect of Cochlear Synaptopathy on Envelope Following Responses Using a Model of the Auditory Nerve.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2019Article
- Age-related Changes in Neural Coding of Envelope Cues: Peripheral Declines and Central Compensation.Neuroscience · 2019Review
- Aging alters envelope representations of speech-like sounds in the inferior colliculus.Neurobiology of aging · 2019Article
- Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.Neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous work has debated about the comparisons of hearing abilities faced with alterations in hearing thresholds and evoked potentials between groups following acoustic trauma- or age-related changes. This study compares envelope-following responses (EFRs) of young and aged rats when sound levels were matched according to (1) wave I amplitudes of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) elicited by 8-kHz tones or (2) EFR amplitudes evoked by sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones at 100% depth. Matched wave I amplitudes across age corresponded to approximately 20-dB sound level differences. For matched wave I, no age-related differences were observed in wave V amplitudes. However, EFRs recorded in silence were enhanced with aging at 100% but not at 25% depth, consistent with enhanced central gain in aging. For matched EFRs, there were no age-related differences in EFRs of amplitude modulation (AM) depth and AM frequency processing. These results suggest novel, objective measures beyond threshold to compensate for differences in auditory nerve activation and to differentiate peripheral and central contributions of EFRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.